[FNZ] Super Role Madness Weebs: New Beginnings
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags 75% honesty absolute peak cinema amp flower ayanokouji > camarel harris > donald truck cheek clapping horny jail jailer loreless weebs game luv ya fellas newbie host hosting weebs omegakill when richard sniffer selling tagspace for karma shoppig in venice tac the survivor this game will become a shopping mall town quickly grab loot boxes before mafia does tree cult victory vote council prof vote lynch fuji
- Status
my issue is my pathos-involved reactions is not really correlated with anything and i expect certain players to realize that after playing for so long with me
anyway, beyond this, i don't have alot of investment in this game period so it reflects poorly in my play. ive admitted to this more than once so far.
do with that what you will. i am not a fan of defending myself generally speaking, regardless despite it being an obvious necessarily. this has no real sense to it other than my mountain of reservations of worrying that it's simply going to be word vomit. ime it's been fairly useless to defend myself because it is just an influx of information im rapidly processing and spewing out all at once. it never does anything
anyway, beyond this, i don't have alot of investment in this game period so it reflects poorly in my play. ive admitted to this more than once so far.
do with that what you will. i am not a fan of defending myself generally speaking, regardless despite it being an obvious necessarily. this has no real sense to it other than my mountain of reservations of worrying that it's simply going to be word vomit. ime it's been fairly useless to defend myself because it is just an influx of information im rapidly processing and spewing out all at once. it never does anything
Ratchet town
I think the nothingburger argument between him and Mango was a stretch but otherwise his arguments fall fully and well in line with how he interrogated suspects as town. The way he's articulating himself also hints as him wanting to solve from the getgo, not just wait to slowly transition into it.
I think the nothingburger argument between him and Mango was a stretch but otherwise his arguments fall fully and well in line with how he interrogated suspects as town. The way he's articulating himself also hints as him wanting to solve from the getgo, not just wait to slowly transition into it.
That's interesting as I have no recollection of ever naming you scum, if you made this conclusion based on my vote then you're once more putting words in my mouth.
Should be clear as day that my vote on you was a clear denial of your narrative, and not much more than that.
I understand what you're saying, but I disagree with the disconnected thought process claim. The weebs '22 is one of my most memorable games for several reasons, it is not strange that I have a strong association with you and our team, and by proxy that game as a whole.
The comment made by odd unsurprisingly left a strong impression, and the way you presented your case made me think back to that comment.
I don't see any reason why that would be disconneted, when it is very much connected and associative.
I am not sure if it's just getting late (night shift cycle), but I am not really sure I understand what you're trying to say prior to the point that you couldn't reasonably know what I was about.
Consider this; I was humoring you and giving you more than was reasonably neccesary because you effectively gave me a in to get involved in the game, why not take full advantage of that, even to a fault?
You have done the job that town is supposed to be doing, be a philosopher and try to make a plausible story of what I am and what I'm doing.
Though that being said, I was initially gobsmacked that you were honing in on the angle you were, which is what led to my reaction and subsequent denial of that notion.
What do I gain from you trying to talk your narrative into existence?
Should be clear as day that my vote on you was a clear denial of your narrative, and not much more than that.
I understand what you're saying, but I disagree with the disconnected thought process claim. The weebs '22 is one of my most memorable games for several reasons, it is not strange that I have a strong association with you and our team, and by proxy that game as a whole.
The comment made by odd unsurprisingly left a strong impression, and the way you presented your case made me think back to that comment.
I don't see any reason why that would be disconneted, when it is very much connected and associative.
I am not sure if it's just getting late (night shift cycle), but I am not really sure I understand what you're trying to say prior to the point that you couldn't reasonably know what I was about.
Consider this; I was humoring you and giving you more than was reasonably neccesary because you effectively gave me a in to get involved in the game, why not take full advantage of that, even to a fault?
You have done the job that town is supposed to be doing, be a philosopher and try to make a plausible story of what I am and what I'm doing.
Though that being said, I was initially gobsmacked that you were honing in on the angle you were, which is what led to my reaction and subsequent denial of that notion.
What do I gain from you trying to talk your narrative into existence?
And if it was planned, what does that tell you?
I voted you because I knew you were pushing BS, what more do I need? The point is that your entire plan of attack was making up some fairytale and try to will it into existence, I've seen you do this as both scum and town. It is not conclusive.
I lose nothing by voting you
I voted you because I knew you were pushing BS, what more do I need? The point is that your entire plan of attack was making up some fairytale and try to will it into existence, I've seen you do this as both scum and town. It is not conclusive.
I lose nothing by voting you
- Status