That's a false assumption. There is no reason for all to be rival if they don't even want the same shit.
Rivalry is not necessarily about one common goal, it can also be about various other subjects.
Kuro for example just wanted to chill at Syrup after getting his hands in Kaya's fortune. He wasn't a rival of Luffy.
Indeed. But Kuro is a special case, he stopped being a pirate. That condition alone deleted his basic rival status as a pirate.
Rocks and Roger have nothing like that.
Yes, they have. It's literally what this picture is implying. That's visual storytelling mate. (on top of all other informations)
There is history and rivalry between these two. They will butthead against each other any time they can, it's pirate rivalry, just like you can see in Pirate of the Carribbean. It's old school stuff.
Yea. I believe manga forced Law into a rival at the end of Wano. But they never said Shanks and Mihawk remains rivals.
It is implied through their relationship. The way they talk, the way they percieve eachothers, the conflict that arise when they see one another.
This rivarly is literally reflected in the fanbase in the Shanks/mihawk debate. Such powerscaling debate do not arrive for no reason, but because the story implies a Rivarly that is accaparated by fan. Oda knows what he is doing.
Roger has no idea if Rocks is going or not to save Shakky. He knows he let her being taken, doesn't matter if it is on purpose or not it is his land so he is responsible for that.
Yeah, that's what I implied mate. Read correctly.
Roger doesn't know why Rocks is going to God's Valley and his first logical thought is "he is making a move, we won't let him get there first". > This implies that Roger thinks Rocks is there for the same reason and ended up wanting to attack the celestial dragon, when in reality, he wants to save his son.
This is the entire reason why we got this panel :
Roger does not understand why Rocks is there in the first place.
The point is. They are still Rivals. But Roger doesn't have all the info.
Yea right now it is unexplained but it will be pretty much unexplicable as well.
Why ? You make no sense. it's very easy to explain. A single page is enough. And this page is not even needed, you can't understand the parrallel between Smoker and Luffy and Roger and Garp yourself ?
Garp's character is slowly looking worse and worse.
For what reason ? at this point, you guys are just saying random hatefull stuff just to look like you understand what makes a good character or not
It's if I said... from nowhere "well... Luffy is eating meat now... his character is slowly looking worse and worse". This is the same level of nonsense lol
And stop talking about understanding like you know shit better than others. You don't.
I know better about story that you do. And politics also. This is a simple probability.
You are not likely to have the same education on One Piece or Storytelling that I have. I highly doubt about that. So do not try to lecture me about the story like you usually do.
Really, you will never find an opened hear.
Yea it does. You said that Sanji needed to evolve. Bullshit specially because he didn't evolved a shit.
And that's why I understand the story. I you don't. I won't take the time to explained it to you. Others have already done it beautiful.
Have fun:
That's not what retcon are. I'm talking about a real new backstory.
Either on the two year timeskip or even after his pledge to be a doctor like Hiluluk. Oda is skilled enough to pull this off.
But in terms of good writting there isn't room for it.
You have no imagination. Really.