What does it take? I know Rootbeer and some sanji fans like to think that zoro has no acoc only to downplay him. The only guy who thinks genuinely that zoro has no acoc is rootbeer. You can tell by his effort to prove a point that cannot be proven since manga doesn’t agree with his delusions.
My question is if he ever will accept zoro to have ACoC even when manga proves this man wrong. I am not talking about sanji fans who agree to this mans delusions since it only fits their agenda to make zoro close to sanji. The eternal wings cope if you want.
Now Rootbeer you gotta answer us some Questions. Here we go:
1. Where did you gasp the idea that swordsmen cannot have advanced conquerors? Was it somewhere stated in the manga? Or did Oda state it in a sbs or something?
2. What are the sharp objects that roger and shanks hold when they fight? Carrots? Eggplants? Dildos? I cannot seem to know what these ACoC users are using in their hands to combat
3. Where did you get the idea that ACoC is no touch or red lightning? Was it stated in the manga or by oda? Did he specifically say that conquerors coating needs to be both or either of these? Or did you just pull that shit through a prophecy or some kind of spiritual vision you had when you were on ketamine?
4. If conquerors coating is truly no touching only why was it drawn by oda himself so many times touching? Are you going to cope and say that oda cornered himself when he introduced conquerors coating? How do you know that? Did you meet him and asked him about that topic directly or where do you get this cope mechanism from?
5. Why is conquerors coating always being illustrated as thick lighting trails that follow a weapon or a brawlers fist? Why does this apply to everyone but not zoro when he literally has the same thing as them?
6. Can you prove your points by either the manga or odas words through sbs? If you are using some manga panels and having hallucinations doesn’t mean its canon. Someone who is delusional and experiences visual distortion cannot gasp the reality without treatment. For example I see black lightning trails therefore its conquerors coating. You see black lightning on zoro and call it CoA but black lightning on other characters is somehow conquerors coating. Maybe you also see zoro as a clown and mistake him for buggy we never know.
7. Does anything you claim support manga canon or did oda say anything remotely close to your claims? The only thing I see is you fantasize and hallucinate about things that are clearly not meant the way you are claiming it.
I know you are going to read this. Have balls and answer these questions and stop ignoring me.
My question is if he ever will accept zoro to have ACoC even when manga proves this man wrong. I am not talking about sanji fans who agree to this mans delusions since it only fits their agenda to make zoro close to sanji. The eternal wings cope if you want.
Now Rootbeer you gotta answer us some Questions. Here we go:
1. Where did you gasp the idea that swordsmen cannot have advanced conquerors? Was it somewhere stated in the manga? Or did Oda state it in a sbs or something?
2. What are the sharp objects that roger and shanks hold when they fight? Carrots? Eggplants? Dildos? I cannot seem to know what these ACoC users are using in their hands to combat
3. Where did you get the idea that ACoC is no touch or red lightning? Was it stated in the manga or by oda? Did he specifically say that conquerors coating needs to be both or either of these? Or did you just pull that shit through a prophecy or some kind of spiritual vision you had when you were on ketamine?
4. If conquerors coating is truly no touching only why was it drawn by oda himself so many times touching? Are you going to cope and say that oda cornered himself when he introduced conquerors coating? How do you know that? Did you meet him and asked him about that topic directly or where do you get this cope mechanism from?
5. Why is conquerors coating always being illustrated as thick lighting trails that follow a weapon or a brawlers fist? Why does this apply to everyone but not zoro when he literally has the same thing as them?
6. Can you prove your points by either the manga or odas words through sbs? If you are using some manga panels and having hallucinations doesn’t mean its canon. Someone who is delusional and experiences visual distortion cannot gasp the reality without treatment. For example I see black lightning trails therefore its conquerors coating. You see black lightning on zoro and call it CoA but black lightning on other characters is somehow conquerors coating. Maybe you also see zoro as a clown and mistake him for buggy we never know.
7. Does anything you claim support manga canon or did oda say anything remotely close to your claims? The only thing I see is you fantasize and hallucinate about things that are clearly not meant the way you are claiming it.
I know you are going to read this. Have balls and answer these questions and stop ignoring me.
