Questions & Mysteries When will Zoro use KoH

Zoro says when he uses koh and
Black lighting was a small spark on one sword
:kayneshrug:
Even when they clash its just the smoke
Lucci could barely hang with 2 swords basic coa zoro
There are no named attack in a off screened fight my dude..

You'd be better off arguing that Zoro may have used KoH, but he only used a low level KoH attack than trying so say he didn't use KoH at all..
 
Green shit smoke is more than enough, but green shit smoke + lightning? You're cooked bro.

According to you guys, Zoro's clash with Nusjuro wasn't ACoC, so Luffy hasn't used even the tiniest bit of ACoC all of Egghead.
Hate to break it down to you, but even though it looks like he is using it, its not KoH. Just like it is always highlighted when luffy uses G5 or Sanji Ifrit Jambe, the same applies to Zoro. Gear 5, ifrit and KoH are their ultimate techniques up to date. Whatever zoro used on that panel is not KoH. He didn‘t even say KoH like he did always. Im sure oda wouldn‘t let zoro use his most powerful form off screen just like that.
 
Zoro fans are so scared of Toei having Zoro using KOH knowing it will make him appear below Luffy again, right where he's always been, home sweet home
:ihaha:
 
Last edited:
What if he did.. There wouldn't be debate if he didn't.. It would be obvious.. Zoro fans need mental gymnastics to explain how the flames and Black Lightning are somehow not KoH.. lol
Let's see who does the most mental gymnastics.

Zoro fans: put up a panel from the manga before the name KoH was even coined and we knew nothing about AdvCoC and that Zoro had CoC



Zoro haters: they do mental gymnastics by repeating themselves, saying that it's not worth it because they don't like it or ignoring it over and over again.

Between putting images without needing any explanation and putting images in which you need aeronautical engineering to understand them, images that do not exist, names of attacks that do not exist, justify that a guy immobile and unable to move is less serious than someone with a band-aid. ...I think it's clear who makes mental Ginasia.

Now tell me, in that image Zoro used the KoH yes or no?
Post automatically merged:

Zoro fans are so scared of Toei having Zoro using KOH knowing it will make him appear below Luffy again, right where he's always been, home sweet home
:ihaha:
I remind you that Luffy used the G5 to cause a measly scratch to Lucci. Not even with the KoH Zoro will look below Luffy.

Not to mention that you only care about Toei when you care...
 
Let's see who does the most mental gymnastics.

Zoro fans: put up a panel from the manga before the name KoH was even coined and we knew nothing about AdvCoC and that Zoro had CoC



Zoro haters: they do mental gymnastics by repeating themselves, saying that it's not worth it because they don't like it or ignoring it over and over again.

Between putting images without needing any explanation and putting images in which you need aeronautical engineering to understand them, images that do not exist, names of attacks that do not exist, justify that a guy immobile and unable to move is less serious than someone with a band-aid. ...I think it's clear who makes mental Ginasia.

Now tell me, in that image Zoro used the KoH yes or no?
It's dishonest to show an image where it was pre-Enma tamed.. Zoro has Enma tamed now, he's not going back to when he didn't have it tamed.. That's such a bogus argument..
 
It's dishonest to show an image where it was pre-Enma tamed.. Zoro has Enma tamed now, he's not going back to when he didn't have it tamed.. That's such a bogus argument..
Sorry? Is it dishonest to show images from the manga?

What is dishonest is to ignore them because they do not coincide with your opinion. It doesn't matter if Zoro tamed Enma or not, the KoH does not depend on Enma but on the CoC, yes, on the CoC since it appeared after it was confirmed that Zoro is a user of it.

Which is dishonest to rely on things we can't see, like an off-panel fight.

What is dishonest is ignoring what Oda shows you. Like Zoro defeating Lucci in the first attack with a name shown.

What is dishonest is valuing similar things differently depending on the person involved...

So I ask you the same question: tell me, in that image Zoro used the KoH yes or no?

 
Sorry? Is it dishonest to show images from the manga?

What is dishonest is to ignore them because they do not coincide with your opinion. It doesn't matter if Zoro tamed Enma or not, the KoH does not depend on Enma but on the CoC, yes, on the CoC since it appeared after it was confirmed that Zoro is a user of it.

Which is dishonest to rely on things we can't see, like an off-panel fight.

What is dishonest is ignoring what Oda shows you. Like Zoro defeating Lucci in the first attack with a name shown.

What is dishonest is valuing similar things differently depending on the person involved...

So I ask you the same question: tell me, in that image Zoro used the KoH yes or no?

This argument makes completely no sense and is very disingenuous.. The whole point of Zoro vs King was to grow and control Enma and unlocked its full power KoH.. Are you saying Zoro purposely reverted in Lucci's fight and somehow let Enma do as it pleases again?.. Why am i even entertaining this..
 
Top