Powers & Abilities Whitebeard taught AdCoC to Akainu..
- Thread starter Rootbeer
- Start date
You made my point.. The 2 instances you've shown are the same as those using AdCoC..
That's not an argument..
Everytime Whitebeard uses his Devil Fruit there are visual effect of Cracks..
Everytime Whitebeard uses his Devil Fruit there are visual effect of Cracks..
I can't argue against baseless claims. You can't prove ACoC existed back then (at least not in the form that you say), you also say that whenever GGnM is used it is accompanied with cracks. https://mangasee123.com/read-online/One-Piece-chapter-572.html, last two pages, no crack yet WB is using his DF.
What would you call this
He fired this first and then the one above
What would you call this
He fired this first and then the one above
Last edited:
You made my point.. The 2 instances you've shown are the same as those using AdCoC..
Let me reiterate: YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM THAT THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF ACoC DESPITE WHITEBEART BEING UNABLE TO USE EVEN THE BASIC COLOR OF CONQUEROR AT MARINEFORD. THEREFORE IT IS ON YOU TO PROVE THE POSITIVE - THAT THESE ARE REALLY EXAMPLES OF ACoC - NOT ON ME TO PROVE THE NEGATIVE.
Two instances I had shown are him using devil fruit.
These two examples that are a very clear use of his devil fruit ability:
NEITHER OF THEM SHOW ANY CRACKS.
TO SUM IT UP: LITERALLY THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU BELIEVE WHITEBEARD'S FRUIT ALWAYS SHOWS CRACKS WHEN USED IS BECAUSE YOU HAD DECIDED THAT IT MUST SHOW CRACKS AND ARE A PRIORI REJECTING ANY EXAMPLES WHERE THAT IS NOT THE CASE. You have decided on the conclusion you wanted to reach, and then opted to reject and ignore any evidence that was contrary to your preferred conclusion.
I can't argue against baseless claims. You can't prove ACoC existed back then (at least not in the form that you say), you also say that whenever GGnM is used it is accompanied with cracks. https://mangasee123.com/read-online/One-Piece-chapter-572.html, last two pages, no crack yet WB is using his DF.
What would you call this
He fired this first and then the one above
What would you call this
He fired this first and then the one above
Only in your head.
Let me reiterate: YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM THAT THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF ACoC DESPITE WHITEBEART BEING UNABLE TO USE EVEN THE BASIC COLOR OF CONQUEROR AT MARINEFORD. THEREFORE IT IS ON YOU TO PROVE THE POSITIVE - THAT THESE ARE REALLY EXAMPLES OF ACoC - NOT ON ME TO PROVE THE NEGATIVE.
Two instances I had shown are him using devil fruit.
These two examples that are a very clear use of his devil fruit ability:
NEITHER OF THEM SHOW ANY CRACKS.
TO SUM IT UP: LITERALLY THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU BELIEVE WHITEBEARD'S FRUIT ALWAYS SHOWS CRACKS WHEN USED IS BECAUSE YOU HAD DECIDED THAT IT MUST SHOW CRACKS AND ARE A PRIORI REJECTING ANY EXAMPLES WHERE THAT IS NOT THE CASE. You have decided on the conclusion you wanted to reach, and then opted to reject and ignore any evidence that was contrary to your preferred conclusion.
Let me reiterate: YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM THAT THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF ACoC DESPITE WHITEBEART BEING UNABLE TO USE EVEN THE BASIC COLOR OF CONQUEROR AT MARINEFORD. THEREFORE IT IS ON YOU TO PROVE THE POSITIVE - THAT THESE ARE REALLY EXAMPLES OF ACoC - NOT ON ME TO PROVE THE NEGATIVE.
Two instances I had shown are him using devil fruit.
These two examples that are a very clear use of his devil fruit ability:
NEITHER OF THEM SHOW ANY CRACKS.
TO SUM IT UP: LITERALLY THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU BELIEVE WHITEBEARD'S FRUIT ALWAYS SHOWS CRACKS WHEN USED IS BECAUSE YOU HAD DECIDED THAT IT MUST SHOW CRACKS AND ARE A PRIORI REJECTING ANY EXAMPLES WHERE THAT IS NOT THE CASE. You have decided on the conclusion you wanted to reach, and then opted to reject and ignore any evidence that was contrary to your preferred conclusion.
Actually i'm wrong.. Not based on what both of you are saying but when Blackbeard speaks of having both powers
he manifest what i believed to be AdCoC as the quake powers.. So i'm wrong on this one..
