Questions & Mysteries Who gave Luffy food?
- Thread starter centurion
- Start date
.Yeah, I can understand.
Imho the anime has way less contacts than we imagine (as seen with Peter's hair) and so they have actually pulled out a smart move: they created a sheat. I have posted in the past images that showed how Ryo's "sword" don't in fact look like a sword at all: no central line, no grease, etc. It looks like a sheat, very much.
You see, they will have him just unsheate his sword when the time is right and puff, no problem.
Imho the anime has way less contacts than we imagine (as seen with Peter's hair) and so they have actually pulled out a smart move: they created a sheat. I have posted in the past images that showed how Ryo's "sword" don't in fact look like a sword at all: no central line, no grease, etc. It looks like a sheat, very much.
You see, they will have him just unsheate his sword when the time is right and puff, no problem.
Imho, this should have been plenty:
Post automatically merged:
He should just straight out said it was Kizaru or Sanji also moves at speed of light? Hmmm.
Post automatically merged:
Check the dish on the left side of Luffy and the dish Kizaru is using for eating. Foreshadowing.
C'mon, we should've used the simple process of deduction.
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor) is a principle from philosophy. Suppose an event has two possible explanations. The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.
Kizaru doing it was the simple explanation. Everything else had a complex idea attached to it such as Caribou appearing which necessitated that he had previously stolen food supplies and then coincidentally happened to be in the area when Luffy required the food.
How many assumptions did we have to make to consider Caribou?
1. We assume Caribou previously stole food.
2. We assume Caribou had been watching the fight.
3. We assume Caribou had an incentive to help Luffy.
4. We assume Caribou was able to deliver the food without being seen.
That's at least four assumptions. Whereas, with Kizaru, we only had to convince ourselves that he would act contrary to his previous statements.
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor) is a principle from philosophy. Suppose an event has two possible explanations. The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.
Kizaru doing it was the simple explanation. Everything else had a complex idea attached to it such as Caribou appearing which necessitated that he had previously stolen food supplies and then coincidentally happened to be in the area when Luffy required the food.
How many assumptions did we have to make to consider Caribou?
1. We assume Caribou previously stole food.
2. We assume Caribou had been watching the fight.
3. We assume Caribou had an incentive to help Luffy.
4. We assume Caribou was able to deliver the food without being seen.
That's at least four assumptions. Whereas, with Kizaru, we only had to convince ourselves that he would act contrary to his previous statements.
Last edited:
