I may be wrong about this but didn't Shiki fight at MF because he had just escaped Impel Down?
Ok, it looks like you don't know what happened, this is how it happened;
Shiki uses all of his men, and fleet, he planned to defeat Roger with using
superior numbers, but Roger still managed to won that fight, it says stalemate but considering Shiki was wounded after the fight, Roger wasn't, it was a win for Roger.
Then Roger becomes Pirate King, and surrendered himself to the Larines and Government.
When Roger was in Impel Down, (or wherever he was) Shiki invaded marineford island all by himself without using his army and fleet, just to prove Larines are garbage, then killed Larines, and said Roger is too strong, Larines could never capture him.
Then Sengoku + Garp vs. Shiki happened, Shiki didn't lose until half of all marineford got destroyed.
The point is;
Shiki believes he needed superior numbers against Roger, still loses.
Shiki believes he can solo entire Larines without needing his fleet, 1 v 2 against Ladmirals, but loses in the end after destroying half of marineford.
Someone who is
a lot stronger than Shiki, is easily capable of what Shiki planned to do, such as Roger, or Prime WB, or Luffy and Blackbeard etc. And also, it's easier to do it, because Prime Garp > Any other Admiral too.
Just ignore him, he makes arguments so bad such as "Sengoku is weaker than Blackbeard because Sengoku wore bandages after the war"
The guy clearly didn't know what happened with Shiki, just like you didn't know a lot of things about Ladmirals when I debunked your biased thread, stop being butthurt because I debunked your nonsense and you run away, be quiet now, the guy who made you cry is talking.
