Speculations Why couldn’t Rayleigh learn Kamusari?
- Thread starter Shiroyru
- Start date
![[No Name]](https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/data/avatars/o/8/8045.jpg?1622550034){kind=avatar}
They guy who got in kaido top 5 unlike a certain hyped fraud supposed equal to Roger dark king 
Meanwhile in 4 years worth of pirate journey Luffy will become 10000 times stronger than Shanks ever could.
The "mimic" part further supports Shanks is Mihawks bitch, an extremely skilled swordsman since he was a kid and kamurari is flying slash.
Great for playing yourself.
I am sure you aren't such a bastard to say 15 year old Shanks had Roger level haki
Post automatically merged:
It’s because rays less skilled with his blade. He had way stronger haki than a 15 year old kid.
Kamusari was just a technique Roger developed (or learned, not sure if it's a Gol Family or a D thing)... Rayleigh developed/learned his own style differently. Shanks was Roger's apprentice, so he naturally learned his mentor's technique.
If Rayleigh parallels Zoro in his fighting techniques too, he shall have an unique style. Despite Zoro having two different masters (Koushirou and Mihawk), he apparently didn't learn a single technique from them (besides holding a sword and haki)... he developed his own style.
If Rayleigh parallels Zoro in his fighting techniques too, he shall have an unique style. Despite Zoro having two different masters (Koushirou and Mihawk), he apparently didn't learn a single technique from them (besides holding a sword and haki)... he developed his own style.
by ur goat s techer garp
He didn't need to. Kamusari does internal damage, Rayleigh has internal destruction ryuo. It's like Law's shock Willie doing internal damage while Luffy can do that with no named basic punches in base. The haki thing is moot because Shanks was a fodder during the 3-day battle, highly doubt he could use ACoC a year later at 16. Also fitting for a Shanks meat rider to put swordskills ≠ haki.
