Questions & Mysteries Why do you think Oda portrays fatal damage without hype?

Why does fatal attacks lack hype?

  • Total voters
    0
stairs-kun

stairs-kun

Spoiler Provider
‎
#1
#1
Kaido was not knocked down(fell) by Asura just like Whitebeard wasn't knocked down(fell) by half his head getting blown off by Akainu. :kobeha::kobeha::kobeha:


In fact after both of these grievous wounds, the wounded go on to use some of their most powerful moves with seemingly ease.



Now Whitebeard fell to sqaurdo, almost fell to Fodder marines etc., and Kaido fell to Luffy's punch. Both attacks are exponentially weaker than the grievous attacks delivered by Zoro and Akainu. Yet those attacks got more hype than Zoro's and Akainu's.:crazwhat:

Why does Oda give such little attacks so much hype, yet basically skim over the large and deadly ones (except Hakai:zosmug:)??

@Den_Den_Mushi @Garp the Fist @Gol D. Roger @Haoshoku @Nidai_Kitetsu @ShishioIsBack @Cinera @BossYimz @Rivaille @Reborn@Geo @ @Buggy D Clown @TheAncientCenturion @Mikail @AdmiralKinyagi @Thabeast @stormylife @nik87 @MasterD @Camie @Monet@Sade @Rukusho @playa4321 @Enma @Finalbeta @Light D Lamperouge @Cyrus the Cactus @Dragomir @HAJIKATA @Reddot4 @HA001@MD Zolo @Grumpy Zoro @Aknolagon @Ice devil slayer @Zoro @zorojurou @Foxy Bunny @K!NG HARA$H!MA @KiriNigiri @RZ.119@Greenbeard @Queen @LolonoisZolo @Mr. Bushido @ShadyOjiro @Guymieux @IceWitch @Dark Hound @Gon’s Missing Arm @Zenos7@RyumaZoro @Himura @Fenaker @wordyworm @yorosenpai @Don DaSlayer @Sunita @gojo @MarimoHeado @Marimo_420 @Jew D. Boy@Orojackson Refugee @gojo @Blother @Yukihime @Gensui Sazid @bblue @I'mTired @ZoroSlaysDragonTuna @Cross_Marian @solis@kumae @Tamerani @Sea_Intruder @Zowo @style @Sword God Ryuma @Yo Tan Wa



I haven't fixed the tags system yet.
 
Last edited:
uyuu

uyuu

‎
#8
#8
In Kaidou's case, not fatal. A fatal slash from a sword would knock down a person due to blood loss, pain, vital organs being wounded etc. It gave a wound structurally to the skin, but it doesn't reach the vital organs. And also its a sharp object so its energy was focused on penetrating the tissue instead of knocking it.

While Luffy's punch have enough impact to knock down Kaidou since it gave enough knocking energy to be translated into momentum that push Kaidou's mass.

Its kinda apples to oranges if we try to compare sharp injury to blunt injury.

In WB's case though, his brain was melted a real-life medical example can't apply to that situation.
 
Finalbeta

Finalbeta

Hero of Albion
‎
#11
#11
Yes I was typing about this earlier:

Erkan, do you realize that knocking down your opponent doesn't implicate performing the most damage? Be honest. It's crystal clear how it's most likely that way in that instance. Kaido only most likely suffered little damage from Luffy's recent blow, less than being inflicted a permanent scar and spitting a lot of blood from the mouth.
Click to expand...
It would appear that total damage is not necessarily synonym of knocking.
 
Worst

Worst

Custom title
‎
#12
#12
U they are both very different situations imho, u can't compare getting a scar, to someone getting half of his head blown away and still be able to rock, but tbh i think these kind of attacks are made to hype up the opponent and not the one who attacked, i mean what's more crazy Akainu blowing half of WB's head off or WB beating the sh* out of Akainu without half of his brain?

Zoro's situation is different imho,this is more hype for Zoro than Kaido,cuz he was hyped for being immortal,and the most durable thing in the verse with Oden being the only one able to leave a scar on him despite knowing that he challenged Navy/Emperors singlehandedly (took his Ls ofc) yet no one was able to leave another scar on him and Zoro did it , i get that you were expecting Ashura to slice Kaido and Onigashima in two but leaving a scar on Kaido is super duper hype
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top