You look at Luffy and Kid, then at Law. You will know why.
Luffy and Kid are similar in ways Law isn't.
If you look at other popular trios also, you see the pattern.
Luffy and Zoro are similar in ways Sanji isn't.
Luffy and Ace are similar in ways Sabo isn't.
People can try to come up with loopholes and such, but ultimately try seeing the overall picture. There are generally tendencies that you see in conqueror's that you don't in others.
@Rob Luffy
I would recommend you watch the video made by Morj titled "why Blackbeard won't have conqueror's haki"
The best analysis on the topic I've seen.
It focuses on Blackbeard, but in general goes into conqueror's haki and addressed Luffy/Kid/Law in them as well
Luffy and Kid are similar in ways Law isn't.
If you look at other popular trios also, you see the pattern.
Luffy and Zoro are similar in ways Sanji isn't.
Luffy and Ace are similar in ways Sabo isn't.
People can try to come up with loopholes and such, but ultimately try seeing the overall picture. There are generally tendencies that you see in conqueror's that you don't in others.
Post automatically merged:
@Rob Luffy
I would recommend you watch the video made by Morj titled "why Blackbeard won't have conqueror's haki"
The best analysis on the topic I've seen.
It focuses on Blackbeard, but in general goes into conqueror's haki and addressed Luffy/Kid/Law in them as well
Katakuri is more comparable to Law than Kidd, for example. Sengoku is another example that’s comparable to Law.
The only thing tying them together is Oda’s whimsy. It’s clear that he wants to keep it very selective, especially for those whose characters revolve around Luffy.