Character Discussion Would Zoro fans drop One Piece if Momo scars Kaido with Oden's Haki Sword?
- Thread starter Vongola Primo
- Start date
Indeed, if Luffy turns his punches into atomic bombs that will make his enemy's flesh explode he may leave scars, but the problem with the reasoning I'm answering to revolves around the absurd of underestimating Luffy's attack power because his punches won't scar Kaido but a sword will and supporting it with Sakazuki's punch, which was a blast of magma that went all through Jinbe's body right to Luffy's chest.
According to oda, Akainu has the devil fruit with the strongest ap in the series, so comparing that with condom its a little to much.
Sakazuki call it punch, but its just magma shapped like that, magma with coa and possible acoc will pass through anything, Akainu isnt leaving any scars without his devil fruit, he weak af.
Post automatically merged:
Sakazuki call it punch, but its just magma shapped like that, magma with coa and possible acoc will pass through anything, Akainu isnt leaving any scars without his devil fruit, he weak af.
"Loser", said the person who has never, ever showed to be more than a simpleton in this forum. A magma punch from Sakazuki lacks
representativeness regarding punches's capability of scarring, just like monotremes's eggs don't represent the mammals as a whole.
Punches plus magma leave scars, among many other things. Punches alone don't. And using the former in a debate about the scarring capabilities of the latter is just an association fallacy, and one of the cheapest. Unless Luffy develops magma in his punches and becomes capable of scorching skin plus destroying flesh on a daily basis, nobody should give a shit about how he was scarred.
representativeness regarding punches's capability of scarring, just like monotremes's eggs don't represent the mammals as a whole.
Punches plus magma leave scars, among many other things. Punches alone don't. And using the former in a debate about the scarring capabilities of the latter is just an association fallacy, and one of the cheapest. Unless Luffy develops magma in his punches and becomes capable of scorching skin plus destroying flesh on a daily basis, nobody should give a shit about how he was scarred.
So, just like swords won't scar Kaido unless other requirements are present, punches won't scar unless some requirements are present too; and, so far, the only scarring punch happened to come with the power of one of the most destructive fruits ever which generates a substance hotter than fire capable of burning, melting and corroding skin and flesh; therefore scarring it.
Although your own example doesn't get to cover this because what scars from Sakazuki's attack is his magma, while what scars from slashing Kaido is still the slash, not the haki by itself. But who cares at this point.
Congratulations, now you understand by your own case why nobody gives a shit about your idiotic "counterexample" and how non-significant it is for anybody with more than one brain cell.
Although your own example doesn't get to cover this because what scars from Sakazuki's attack is his magma, while what scars from slashing Kaido is still the slash, not the haki by itself. But who cares at this point.
Congratulations, now you understand by your own case why nobody gives a shit about your idiotic "counterexample" and how non-significant it is for anybody with more than one brain cell.
I’ve brought this up multiple times - say what you will about Chrono and kurwa (and I will/have), but at least they were trying to do something with their baiting, they had the capacity to follow through and give as good as they got…the new crop of Sanji stans leaves a lot to be desired, a word I’m using VERY loosely 
