When did I say a swordsman can't be a fighter? 
Zoro can be both fighter and swordsman, while Luffy and Sanji are both fighters and captain / cook.
Just because ''fighter'' Zoro lift weights and learns other stuff, that doesn't mean that's for being a swordsman.
Otherwise Luffy will be the strongest swordsman, he can lift more weight, and his Haki is stronger than Zoro's.
The main difference between Luffy and Zoro is sword skill, not able to understand this is not normal, even little kids can understand this.

Zoro can be both fighter and swordsman, while Luffy and Sanji are both fighters and captain / cook.
Just because ''fighter'' Zoro lift weights and learns other stuff, that doesn't mean that's for being a swordsman.
Otherwise Luffy will be the strongest swordsman, he can lift more weight, and his Haki is stronger than Zoro's.
The main difference between Luffy and Zoro is sword skill, not able to understand this is not normal, even little kids can understand this.
But my main question is, what exactly does this has to do with your main claim? you argued someone that said WSS is worlds strongest, not worlds most skilled



No he does not. It's only about being a swordsman, people can still fight after dropping their swords, then mihawk's title would mean nothing for them. A swordsman can still be a fighter at the same time, which means mihawk's title is a very small and he can still lose against inferior swordsman, if that inferior swordsman is a better fighter than mihawk, which is why it's not weird to see Vista being equal to mihawk, because a fight is not all about being a swordsman, there are more to it, a lot more.