How will the Supernovas fare against Hybrid Kaido?


  • Total voters
    338
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Roger alone prove you don't have to WSM or WSS or be STRONGEST ... while he was both a man and a swordsman

Shanks have far better feat and hype than Mihawk
Shanks fought WSS equally +12 years ago
Shanks clashed WSM equally
Shanks stopped and live rent free in WSC mind
Shanks is hire to Roger and ideal to Luffy
Shanks stopped the war by force and influence
Shanks is end game boss while Mihawk is not a boss
Shanks is a Great Pirate and Yonko and both of this are massive hype
Shanks is a 4 Billion Pirate in VERY young age
Shanks and Teach seems to be on same level just like Kaido and Big Mom are
and ...

a single title with no clear source is not enough to over rule all of this hype
and btw Shanks himself didn't consider Mihawk above him ... why should I



at this moment ... no one but Mihawk can change my mind
and THE ONLY way he do that is ON SCREEN FEAT
I don't care, hope Shanks isn't a swordsman, can't you understand yet? if Shanks is a swordsman, he's down.
 
Luffy had an advance CoO ability in FS and he still got rocked by Kaido. Kizaru would meet the same fate.
actually luffy was barley fazed by that he tagged him but nothing, future sight is not above kizaru in speed also, luffy got rocked by lighting
Again Rayleigh CoA confirmed he has interal destruction, only gave kizaru a scratch and he has immense CoO too
you tryna debate the author huh? not gonna waste time tho if you're
 

Uncle Van

Bullets don't hurt. But Taxes do.
How can he be a swordsman without using a sword? :milaugh: Is Luffy a swordsman too? Wtf are you talking about?

Zoro desperately needs sword to fight, that's all about it. In that fight he wasn't allowed to use swords due to rules.
So Zoro isnt a swordsman since he can fight without them. Got it. His strength with or without is irrlevant to the point. Well....unless I mentioned how your logic applies skill to combat strength anyways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top