Current Events Kid and Law are just getting started.

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
#65
I believe they have more. They'll bust out everything they have against Big Mom and Hybrid Kaido. Law already used Gamma knife, he probably has some new techniques he'll use. Kid hasn't used that many attacks, I'm sure he'll do something. Luffy will be out of it for a while, expecting Law and Kid to put up a fight against the 2 Yonko.
its now or never for them 2
luffy is out and zoro is handicapped by luffy
if there was ever a time for them to step up its now
 
#66
You're right Kidd isnt Law. Kidd is meant to be a foil to Lufffy.

Kidd & Killer are what Luffy & Zoro would be if they didnt train for 2 years


Hes also what would have happened if Luffy didnt have his charisma
And? Why do you people think being a foil is a bad thing? Do you not realize that Law is a foil to Luffy as well? Do you not realize that rivals to the mc in 90% of shonen are also foils? Kidd is both a rival and a foil. I like it how I type out every single way that Oda has portrayed Luffy and Kidd as the top supernova and your response is, “Ok, Kidd is a foil.” You literally made no point here. Yeah Kidd is a foil and that doesn’t change the fact that he has better portrayal than Law. Lol You posted a picture of Kidd being beat up by Kaido as if literally the same thing didn’t happen to Luffy. Now please find me a picture of Kidd beat up like that by someone who isn’t a Yonko lol. Kidd not having Luffy’s charisma is literally the one main difference that separates them, and that is intentional by the author. Now tell what that has to do with Kidd having better portrayal than Law? Does Law have Luffy’s charisma?
 
Last edited:
#68
And? Why do you people think being a foil is a bad thing? Do you not realize that Law is a foil to Luffy as well? Do you not realize that rivals to the mc in 90% of shonen are also foils? Kidd is both a rival and a foil. I like it how I type out every single way that Oda has portrayed Luffy and Kidd as the top supernova and your response is, “Ok, Kidd is a foil.” You literally made no point here. Yeah Kidd is a foil and that doesn’t change the fact that he has better portrayal than Law. Lol You posted a picture of Kidd being beat up by Kaido as if literally the same thing didn’t happen to Luffy. Now please find me a picture of Kidd beat up like that by someone who isn’t a Yonko lol. Kidd not having Luffy’s charisma is literally the one main difference that separates them, and that is intentional by the author. Now tell what that has to do with Kidd having better portrayal than Law? Does Law have Luffy’s charisma?
Luffy and kid top supernova? Luffy and zoro are the top supernova. Stop smoking
 
#69
The fact zoro is using three sword style and has his bandana on already should worry you especially since Kidd isn’t even using haki yet and law didn’t unsheathed his sword.

If you seriously judge a fight that barely started then your the one gonna be angry not me
the same could be said about luffy, luffy already use g4 and ran out his haki.. we know the fight is just getting started, no need to worry novas will triumph against yonkos.
 
#72
Yeah Kidd is a foil and that doesn’t change the fact that he has better portrayal than Law.
What is “better portrayal” in the context here?

like the thread is about this arc and combat in this arc and story importance in this arc right?

let me ask, does Kid have “better portrayal” than Otama? Like for the 100 chapters of this arc, is Kid set up to be more important than Otama?

Does Kid lifting boulders mean he’s more important to the story of this arc than Otama meeting Ace and having a df to directly counter Kaido’s crew and the whole joining a crew thing?

Anha? Is Kid lifting a Boulder “better portrayal” than Otama?

if you wanna talk about Combat then is Kid lifting a Boulder better portrayal than Zoro having feats comparable to Oden? Zoro for 100 chapters of this arc gets storylines and feats and even direct connections to Oden and it’s made a very big deal his challenging Kaido to the point that he gets a whole chapter dedicated to him just declaring that he is gonna cut Kaido up which Kid gets like four panels maybe in the whole arc with zero dedicated storylines.

So is Kid’s “portrayal” in terms of his combat significance against Kaido better because he lifted a Boulder than Zoro who gets compared to Oden?

I mean what do you even mean “better portrayal”? If you wanna say “Law was a big deal in Dressrosa so Kid is getting the law treatment in Wano so he must be a big deal” NO HE’S NOT. Zoro is the closest thing to what Law was in Dressrosa for Wano.

Honestly at this point you are just pulling shit out of nowhere. You want to pretend like the last 100 chapters of Luffy and Zoro have been Luffy and Kid because Kid lifted a Boulder one time.
 
#73
Luffy and kid top supernova? Luffy and zoro are the top supernova. Stop smoking
Can one, just one of you guys actually refute my points and not just spew your headcanon. Again, I am arguing that Kidd has better portrayal than Law. I have given examples from the arc they both introduced until now. Go back and read all my points on how Oda has portrayed Luffy and Kidd above Law, and refute just one of them. Saying Kidd is a “foil” doesn’t mean shit, as I already explained to the guy who thought he proved a point. Now if you are going to quote me, then please tell me how Law has better portrayal than Kidd. And since I know this is coming, please don’t use screen time or plot relevance up to this point as an argument because that is not an argument portrayal for Law having better portrayal.
Post automatically merged:

What is “better portrayal” in the context here?

like the thread is about this arc and combat in this arc and story importance in this arc right?

let me ask, does Kid have “better portrayal” than Otama? Like for the 100 chapters of this arc, is Kid set up to be more important than Otama?

Does Kid lifting boulders mean he’s more important to the story of this arc than Otama meeting Ace and having a df to directly counter Kaido’s crew and the whole joining a crew thing?

Anha? Is Kid lifting a Boulder “better portrayal” than Otama?

if you wanna talk about Combat then is Kid lifting a Boulder better portrayal than Zoro having feats comparable to Oden? Zoro for 100 chapters of this arc gets storylines and feats and even direct connections to Oden and it’s made a very big deal his challenging Kaido to the point that he gets a whole chapter dedicated to him just declaring that he is gonna cut Kaido up which Kid gets like four panels maybe in the whole arc with zero dedicated storylines.

So is Kid’s “portrayal” in terms of his combat significance against Kaido better because he lifted a Boulder than Zoro who gets compared to Oden?

I mean what do you even mean “better portrayal”? If you wanna say “Law was a big deal in Dressrosa so Kid is getting the law treatment in Wano so he must be a big deal” NO HE’S NOT. Zoro is the closest thing to what Law was in Dressrosa for Wano.

Honestly at this point you are just pulling shit out of nowhere. You want to pretend like the last 100 chapters of Luffy and Zoro have been Luffy and Kid because Kid lifted a Boulder one time.
You typed all this for nothing. Go back earlier into the thread and you will see where I explained what I mean when I say Kidd has better portrayal than Law. He’s had better portrayal since the arc they both introduced and that has not changed.
 
#74
Can one, just one of you guys actually refute my points and not just spew your headcanon. Again, I am arguing that Kidd has better portrayal than Law. I have given examples from the arc they both introduced until now. Go back and read all my points on how Oda has portrayed Luffy and Kidd above Law, and refute just one of them. Saying Kidd is a “foil” doesn’t mean shit, as I already explained to the guy who thought he proved a point. Now if you are going to quote me, then please tell me how Law has better portrayal than Kidd. And since I know this is coming, please don’t use screen time or plot relevance up to this point as an argument because that is not an argument portrayal for Law having better portrayal.
Post automatically merged:


You typed all this for nothing. Go back earlier into the thread and you will see where I explained what I mean when I say Kidd has better portrayal than Law. He’s had better portrayal since the arc they both introduced and that has not changed.
Where did you see me say anything about law . You said luffy and kid are top supernovas and o said it’s luffy and zoro.
 
#77
Y’all realize that irl Kidd never achieved his goal and is by and large considered the unluckiest pirates of all time?
So what?
Roronoa, inspired by Francois L'Olonnaise, shares no similarity with the real pirate
Hawkins, inspired by John Hawkins, shares no similarity with the real one
Apoo, inspired to Chui A-poo, shares only a physical resemblance with the real one
Bonney, inspired to Anne Bonney, was basically Calico Jack partner. Calico Jack is the pirate which inspired Crocodile character, does this mean he has some relation to Bonney?
The only 2 who share similarities with the real pirate are Drake and Urouge (based on Francis Drake and Grigori Rasputin), the former being a British vice admiral and the latter being a monk

Yours is just an assumption
 
#79
So what?
Roronoa, inspired by Francois L'Olonnaise, shares no similarity with the real pirate
Hawkins, inspired by John Hawkins, shares no similarity with the real one
Apoo, inspired to Chui A-poo, shares only a physical resemblance with the real one
Bonney, inspired to Anne Bonney, was basically Calico Jack partner. Calico Jack is the pirate which inspired Crocodile character, does this mean he has some relation to Bonney?
The only 2 who share similarities with the real pirate are Drake and Urouge (based on Francis Drake and Grigori Rasputin), the former being a British vice admiral and the latter being a monk

Yours is just an assumption
Damn you didn’t have to drop all those facts on him like that :milaugh:
 
Top