Yeah Kidd is a foil and that doesn’t change the fact that he has better portrayal than Law.
What is “better portrayal” in the context here?
like the thread is about this arc and combat in this arc and story importance in this arc right?
let me ask, does Kid have “better portrayal” than Otama? Like for the 100 chapters of this arc, is Kid set up to be more important than Otama?
Does Kid lifting boulders mean he’s more important to the story of this arc than Otama meeting Ace and having a df to directly counter Kaido’s crew and the whole joining a crew thing?
Anha? Is Kid lifting a Boulder “better portrayal” than Otama?
if you wanna talk about Combat then is Kid lifting a Boulder better portrayal than Zoro having feats comparable to Oden? Zoro for 100 chapters of this arc gets storylines and feats and even direct connections to Oden and it’s made a very big deal his challenging Kaido to the point that he gets a whole chapter dedicated to him just declaring that he is gonna cut Kaido up which Kid gets like four panels maybe in the whole arc with zero dedicated storylines.
So is Kid’s “portrayal” in terms of his combat significance against Kaido better because he lifted a Boulder than Zoro who gets compared to Oden?
I mean what do you even mean “better portrayal”? If you wanna say “Law was a big deal in Dressrosa so Kid is getting the law treatment in Wano so he must be a big deal” NO HE’S NOT. Zoro is the closest thing to what Law was in Dressrosa for Wano.
Honestly at this point you are just pulling shit out of nowhere. You want to pretend like the last 100 chapters of Luffy and Zoro have been Luffy and Kid because Kid lifted a Boulder one time.