One can argue about that something like: Luffy kept close to Katakuri and they had most of time a mele fight, so Katakuri didn't have the time to use Mochi (though he had opportunities to use it).
Sanji didn't need to learn it to dodge though.
Unless you're saying he already had it?
Not even I would be able to wank Sanji that much.
Props to you.
:cheers:
That's the point of why it's intriguing and a way more interesting epithet than something generic like "God of sword".
He's called Rayleigh. It's quite self-explanatory (John William Strutt).
I know, and it feels like a thirteen year-old naming his fanfic character.
My grievance comes from how they all sound like something an uncreative teenager would come up with, and why those "successfully applied" epithets are among the least inspired in this story. "Pirate hunter" remains simple yet contains that oxymoronic ground that I find quite interesting now that Zoro is a pirate himself, and at the same time stresses the trend among the Straw Hats (bar Luffy and Usopp) of "disliking" pirates. It's the exact same strength as Jinbe being known as a pirate who hates pirates, as stated in his introduction, and maintains the humble origins of a character based on growing from nothing to the top.
Sure, but it's not like Zoro even once considered himself as a pirate hunter.
Plus, it's a nickname he got from his accomplishments when he was hunting for bounties back then.
But now that he is a pirate, it would be better to give him a new nickname inspired by his pirate feats.
argument never changed
you just never read the conversation....
"The thing is, it doesn't matter if Luffy eclipsed it, since Luffy is stronger than Sanji, so Sanji's feat is impressive, and more because of that actually, because Luffy is stronger than him. "
Yes I read, and you said that it was less impressive to that comment since Luffy dodged Katakuri a lot during his fight.
And now you switched the argument with the verb "eclipse" instead of "less impressive" which gives a different meaning to it.
Because it can't be "less impressive" if the character doing it is stronger, so you switched to "eclipsing", which is retarded since it is obvious, Luffy eclipsed Sanji against Katakuri because he had a full fight with him. Small difference.
"was impressive till luffy dodged katakuri majority of the fight not just once."
and this:
"context
sanji dodging katakuri was very impressive however luffy doing it multiple times eclipsed that.......... "
the same?
You kidding?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.