Which is not the point. I am not asking for an objective definition, if there was a completely clear one, people would not argue over it.
I am asking for your definition, and without any attitude or ill intent mind you, just saying since this topic can get heated sometimes.
I do think Oda distinguishes between swordsman and swordsman who follow a warrior´s code/bushido or whatever you wanna call it, but question is whether that´s any relevant your definition.
I am asking for your definition, and without any attitude or ill intent mind you, just saying since this topic can get heated sometimes.
I do think Oda distinguishes between swordsman and swordsman who follow a warrior´s code/bushido or whatever you wanna call it, but question is whether that´s any relevant your definition.
Which is not the point. I am not asking for an objective definition, if there was a completely clear one, people would not argue over it.
I am asking for your definition, and without any attitude or ill intent mind you, just saying since this topic can get heated sometimes.
I do think Oda distinguishes between swordsman and swordsman who follow a warrior´s code/bushido or whatever you wanna call it, but question is whether that´s any relevant your definition.
I am asking for your definition, and without any attitude or ill intent mind you, just saying since this topic can get heated sometimes.
I do think Oda distinguishes between swordsman and swordsman who follow a warrior´s code/bushido or whatever you wanna call it, but question is whether that´s any relevant your definition.
Shiryu? Law? Cabaji?