angle wise this makes sense and logically so as well unless you have evidence that angle doesn't matter and even with that comment box on his beak making it looks so.
are you insinuating oda's willingly bending and straightening His beak for some fancy affect.. what in the retardation would that be . and for what reason.. which he never has done to character yet but this poor lad's beak.. even page one's figs or whatever are logical realistically.. but there isn't a ptranodon with a bent beak.
and the comment box doesn help.. if you still wanna keep this going just look at his "Straight" beak in previous panel when he's in air it visually bent.. you' re pointing out vague panels that you can't conclude crap from but still could he argued against than for..
and
@ConquistadoR it can't be design choice we know oda keeps certain things realistic and dinosaur designs have been consistent and realistic throughout.. King shouldn't be an exception
if you call it design choice logical and realistically speaking which oda has been consistent with in Wano ... bring me one specie of Pteranodon that has a bent beak..
and yesterday you brought up the anime for Kibg's beak.. tho it looked normal and not abnormally bent you didn't reply but here's the manga panel
matter the fact there are more panels of King's bent beak than yall rambling about vague and angle-contingent panels that you take as king's straight beak