It's how he says things, malicious and matter of factly
Hmm I've actually liked most of his takes tbh. Didn't find them too malicious.
Maybe he's just being very confident in his posts - If I'm understanding your "matter of facty" reason.
not really disagree but I'd like to know how did u come to this conclusion with Lanji, Prof and ultra
Lanji and Prof from their cases on Muugen, Jinri and Broki.
Prof as scum wouldn't go and drop an ISO on Broki. Never seen him do that in all his scum games. I've liked his take on players and how he's rational, questioning and takes a step back to reevaluate. He's also brought different opinions to the game that I've liked. Overall gameplay is very townie from a meta and content point of view.
Lanji has been very genuine in his posts and this is reflected best in his unique voting patterns, suggestions and reads. I don't know Lanij's view of Nick, but I don't think he would have questioned Juliet much otherwise. He even insists that he'll go back and give it a reread. His case on Jinri is something I agree with and he's been pushing it well. He also questioned my reevaluation of Odd's read and that tells me he's paying attention and shows a sense of curiosity. He could have easily jumped on it, but chose to ask instead.
Ultra - A lot of activity. Tbh I think Ultra has an activity meta. I may be wrong, but I think it's there. His activity this game screams town to me. I've liked him going against the flow, and rethinking on stances. A recent situation was when I came out with my ability usage on Muugen and told players Muugen is very much town. He really thought it through with Gram. What I would gain from this? How would this implicate Muugen and me and more.
actually after ISO'ing
@Rej posts he seems more townie to me than what I expected there was a post or two I didn't like much but not that bad. he can be a third party but I don't see him as mafia,
Hmm. Any posts in particular?