General & Others Ace’s Novel : Part 2
- Thread starter Rivaille
- Start date
W
Thanks and do not hesitate to correct any mistake I might have done :giggle:
Concerning the Mihawk/Shanks part, I have two instances where it is named :
Page 50 you have those sentences : « Shanks Le Roux était l’une des figures emblématiques de l’âge d’or de la piraterie. Ses nombreux duels contre Mihawk « œil de faucon » avaient défrayé la chronique, et malgré le fait qu’il lui manquait un bras, il avait réussi à rejoindre le groupes des 4 empereurs » .
Which can be translate by « Red Haid was one of the key figure of the golden age era of piracy. His several duels with Mihawk « hawk eyes » had made the headlines, and despite the fact that he lost an arm, he joined the 4 emperors ».
Page 67: « Shanks était surtout connu pour ses nombreux duels contre Mihawk, le meilleur sabreur du monde. »
Which can be translate by : « Shanks was mostly known for his several duels with Mihawk, the world’s strongest swordsman »
Did those part do not exist or are mistranslated?
Concerning the Mihawk/Shanks part, I have two instances where it is named :
Page 50 you have those sentences : « Shanks Le Roux était l’une des figures emblématiques de l’âge d’or de la piraterie. Ses nombreux duels contre Mihawk « œil de faucon » avaient défrayé la chronique, et malgré le fait qu’il lui manquait un bras, il avait réussi à rejoindre le groupes des 4 empereurs » .
Which can be translate by « Red Haid was one of the key figure of the golden age era of piracy. His several duels with Mihawk « hawk eyes » had made the headlines, and despite the fact that he lost an arm, he joined the 4 emperors ».
Page 67: « Shanks était surtout connu pour ses nombreux duels contre Mihawk, le meilleur sabreur du monde. »
Which can be translate by : « Shanks was mostly known for his several duels with Mihawk, the world’s strongest swordsman »
Did those part do not exist or are mistranslated?
D
I still suggest reading the engligh translated ones once they’re out. So you can see for yourself and interpret them however you want.
It’s hard to have a proper discussion with descriptions and interpretations a reader made as things to back up your argument.
(At the end of the day it seems that the best way is to read the original ver....to avoid translation problems altogether
)
It’s hard to have a proper discussion with descriptions and interpretations a reader made as things to back up your argument.
(At the end of the day it seems that the best way is to read the original ver....to avoid translation problems altogether
)
I still suggest reading the engligh translated ones once they’re out. So you can see for yourself and interpret them however you want.
It’s hard to have a proper discussion with descriptions and interpretations a reader made as things to back up your argument.
(At the end of the day it seems that the best way is to read the original ver....to avoid translation problems altogether )
It’s hard to have a proper discussion with descriptions and interpretations a reader made as things to back up your argument.
(At the end of the day it seems that the best way is to read the original ver....to avoid translation problems altogether
)
Though the french translation is just as valid to be honest.
