You said unreasonable stuff? Care to explain? Which part do you find unreasonable?
It is the part in which
@Reborn was accused of being a scum by
@Flower whilst working with
@Bogard based on an earlier dialogue between
@TheAncientCenturion and him.
After that, it is one of these usual "You are suspicious!", "No, you are!" dialogues in the early game.
My personal guess is:
A) Reborn and Co simply try to sound like nothing about them is suspicious.
B) They are baiting reactions from every player to see which one shows some suspicious signs.
C) As scums, they either play very defensive (hence mostly being inactive or going with the majority to avoid being focused too much) or they are directly playing aggressive in order to prevent that people may think "Look, why is user x that silent?", "He/She just goes with the majority" and instead, they could come to a conclusion like that "I doubt scums would play that offensive during day 1! They would unnecessarily make themselves suspicious on the good players."
But as I said, it's day 1 and thus, it is still difficult to search the scum between these users based on this heated debate. I guess, they simply try to bait some suspicious reactions which itself is not really unreasonable.
Since point C) has high risks, I'd say point B) is more likely at this point.
@Reborn:
I've played some mafia games in other forums but it's been a long time that I played the last mafia game. Thus, you can indeed count me as a "new player".