[FNZ] Super Role Madness GimmeMy10McMuffins mafia
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags #midnight the stallion stud #rekt beky hits like a wet noodle ekko your scum game is pathetic husbando sisters alliance kekkologix lynch flowa no joy only girl only pussys are not policylynching properties of both rubber and gum vig ekko waifubros united witches of unbound destiny yummy food for my growth
- Status
"It seems I'm still not getting through. The productivity is only keyed to my thought process because of your altogether unwillingness to parse information you're given. You saw my original statement, and instead of engaging with it, asked for elaboration, which then required clarification. This is why I'm saying your engagement level is very shallow. It's easier to reconcile as you looking for ways to look involved than it is you genuinely trying to solve... well, anything. You telling me "I don't have any problem with the post itself" isn't engagement. You haven't thought about why he makes that post, what relevance it has to the game, and in fact you haven't even explained your own point of view (apparently flat statements are okay when it's you making them?) - repeating "why" like a child isn't a substitute for scumhunting I'm afraid to say.
"*Pretty* consistent? Are you going to explain why you've couched that, or...? I've been the model of consistency on that front."
"Well, thought process analysis doesn't stop at genuine/ingenuine. Is it consistent with something I'd be saying from my claimed role's point of view, am I leading anywhere I shouldn't be, do I display more interest in certain slots than can otherwise be explained by my claim, and so on."
"I haven't botched anything. I'm saying it is within all of our interests to guarantee the success of these kills, hence the need for amps, and it's fairly obvious that I would be given the tools to guarantee deaths when I'm already told half of what I need to identify a player too. That would make my wincon automatic.
none is going to be claiming a character that has killed alot in the thread. there is no realistic way for u to match the role names with the respective player names unless u have a flavor cop of some sort. well, unless u have to rely on town to give u that info too. ur role is very dependent on town dont u think
I did think about it before I ever asked lol. Didn’t see an angle/thought process in his head that made more sense for him to make that entrance as scum rather than town and then decided I didn’t have a problem with it lol. I can’t engage any more than that other than seeing if you see something in it that I didn’t and try to track your thoughts and you apparently didn’t anyway lol. So I’m not even sure why you originally brought it up.
Couching is part of my natural vocabulary lol. You’ve just been consistent.
Couching is part of my natural vocabulary lol. You’ve just been consistent.
"You usually do disagree with reason."
"You're assuming that I said this verification would be instantaneous. I didn't. At some point I'm going to say who I killed so I can continue to receive buffs from the town to ensure my targets die thus expediting my removal from the game. And before all this, before I kill I will obviously be coming forward with the role name. So when you see a writeup of a character killing that role name, if we find it, then... I'm sure you can figure the rest out for yourself."
"I will not be full claiming. There is no pressing need for it, and if I'm under the threat of being lynched, you may as well just do it anyway. The god news is - whether or not you feel good or bad about my slot means absolutely nothing to me. For one - you're not guaranteed Town. For two, results will speak for themselves.
"You come up with the most ridiculous design theories sometimes. A role that ends the game after it kills three times is a complete and total joke. I'm either telling the truth here, or I'm lying, but 'm not telling the truth and also being deceitful around it. To suggest so indicates a lack of actual thought behind your position."
"I'm sure you can do better. I believe in you. Fight on, nippah☆!"
"You may as well be saying nothing here. Why are you "wary" because of my stated wincon?"
"You're going to have to establish this. Yes, how awful. Extrapolation works both ways."
"Bringing up weird posts can serve as a discussion topic (which it has) even if said post isn't intrinsically scummy. Look at how the game got moving already due to it."
"Well, duh. Why do you think I'm claiming?"
"A post can be made as either alignment and still be weird. It was weird. From that branches discussion points, and a lot of this you're saying is now cming in retrospect, which is a tad late in my opinion."
Well I suggest you work on expunging it then, because otherwise it comes across as you wanting to straddle the fence regarding it by giving yourself an out or the option to pivot in your opinion without any discernible consequence."
"That's fairly alarming. My sleep patterns have absolutely nothing to do with you, they're not your concern. You have no requirement to comment on them, and unsolicited comments are seldom appreciated. For that to be your first real engagement in the thread is *weird*."
"You usually do disagree with reason."
"You're assuming that I said this verification would be instantaneous. I didn't. At some point I'm going to say who I killed so I can continue to receive buffs from the town to ensure my targets die thus expediting my removal from the game. And before all this, before I kill I will obviously be coming forward with the role name. So when you see a writeup of a character killing that role name, if we find it, then... I'm sure you can figure the rest out for yourself."
"I will not be full claiming. There is no pressing need for it, and if I'm under the threat of being lynched, you may as well just do it anyway. The god news is - whether or not you feel good or bad about my slot means absolutely nothing to me. For one - you're not guaranteed Town. For two, results will speak for themselves.
"You come up with the most ridiculous design theories sometimes. A role that ends the game after it kills three times is a complete and total joke. I'm either telling the truth here, or I'm lying, but 'm not telling the truth and also being deceitful around it. To suggest so indicates a lack of actual thought behind your position."
i have nothing else to add. we'll revisit day 3. i solve ur slot via results anyway. this indie claim is an icing on the cake for meafraid i cant from my position, atleast not today. whose to say u didnt just wake up today and say to urself "yep, todays the day i break my indie claiming meta" kek
"Are you at all familiar with the concept of "giving the benefit of the doubt"? It means that, while your assumption cannot be assured, you have information (meta, in this case) to suggest that you don't need to be too concerned with it, and so the benefit of the doubt is applied until information comes to light to suggest that it shouldn't be. Which is to say, while I indeed could have just decided to break said meta, to date I've shown no willingness to do so, and so fr the ease of your own solving, you can assume that I wouldn't have broken said meta until further notice."
"Again, you may as well be saying nothing at all. You don't trust me, because of my claim (why), but it wouldn't make sense for me to just claim this because it would make people not trust me, so you... do nothing and hope it just goes away? What exactly is your position on this?
- Status