To be fair, him (or anybody else) talking to his subordinates is to the benefit of us readers in order for us to understand what is going on. Lol.
Besides, Riboku was convinced that Kanki was fecked regardless and didn't need anything more being done.
First statement is true but still he wasted the great opportunity to finish off Kanki with surprise attack and overwhelming numbers while being overconfident and spending time talking to those standies.
Isn't better to have Bananji in reserve in order to deal with unexpected bull like what Kanki is whipping out?
Keep one or two special generals in reserve but he kept four of them. Isn't it too much wasting of resources.
Or now that he lost his favorite Pokémon, Houken, for surprise attack on enemy generals, now he needs more than one general like Banaji to compensate for Houken's loss.
Nah, I do consider there to be a difference here.
If Ouki hadn't of taken the bait (which was less Ouki being baited and more Ouki making a calculated risk that miscalculated a single factor) then Riboku still would have had a massive advantage when he rolled up with a fresh army.
If Keisha hadn't taken the bait, Kanki would have likely been screwed.
The biggest difference between Kanki and Riboku is that Kanki regularly engages in high risk/high reward tactics while Riboku refuses to take any risks and much prefers to shape the battlefield to his liking by stacking every possible advantage to his favour before any fighting has even begun.
Riboku goes out of his way to win battles before they are even fought while Kanki thrives to seize victory in the heat of the moment.
If Ouki hadn't taken the bait :
- He won't be blocked that bell shape mountain where he couldn't retreat.
- In the plains he could have use variety of tactics to either counter incoming Riboku or retreat.
- If not taking the bait, Ouki using Tou and Rokuomi could have destroyed right at that spot. Other than horses, Riboku or his army was below Ouki's army in every aspect.
Just like Riboku, it's all about wild imaginations with the use of "If" and "But".
As for situation of Keisha and him being moving out or not. If Keisha stayed at hill, Kanki would still have removed Kisui by attacking in his city and weakened Keisha army. Imagine Keisha facing Kanki’s brutal army without Kisui's support...... everyone of Keisha's army would get "chopped decorated head" somewhere in the jungles.