- Status
A game actually never got axed, AL and Drago would just push the game back and have push someone who is ready up.
And then we come to another one of the main problems: People queue up without finished setups. They first queue up/reserve the slot, then make the setup. Which was quite the unfair reservation. Another reason why coaches actually had to look after every sign up and verify the sign ups. But in the past slank happened.
And then we come to another one of the main problems: People queue up without finished setups. They first queue up/reserve the slot, then make the setup. Which was quite the unfair reservation. Another reason why coaches actually had to look after every sign up and verify the sign ups. But in the past slank happened.
I meant before, i remember calendar being discussed on OJ same as coaching. People were "fighting" over being approved only to submit games that aren't even balanced or formulated properly. I can't remember who it was, i think it was Bonnie or borto from who i coached that were only ones that actually paid attention to that
And when i took the mantle of coach and wanted to update the calendar i asked for set ups and like you said, vast majority wasn't prepped. This might be a case too here, lack of supervision just leads to lower quality
And when i took the mantle of coach and wanted to update the calendar i asked for set ups and like you said, vast majority wasn't prepped. This might be a case too here, lack of supervision just leads to lower quality
I see, yeah, people imho should slowly step back from hosting oversized games. Games of a size 16-20 have also alot of charme, you can do alot of neat extra mechanics there too. Games go by quicker, you can try alot more different experimental things out before using all your knowledge to host a greatly refined 30+ players game.
On the other hand I understand if someone wants to host a SRM once a year, but then it has to be thoughtly crafted and ready. I see so many people comming up spontanously with a huge setup they want to host, just because it is hype in their mind. And then everyone wants to do it and now things become cloggy.
On the other hand I understand if someone wants to host a SRM once a year, but then it has to be thoughtly crafted and ready. I see so many people comming up spontanously with a huge setup they want to host, just because it is hype in their mind. And then everyone wants to do it and now things become cloggy.
Mashiro Blue
π¦π²πΌπ± πΎπΉπΈπ· πͺ πΌπ±πΈπΈπ½π²π·π° πΌπ½πͺπ» β°
β
D
On the matter of the games themselves, I don't think that's much of an issue considering how everyone's expressed their readiness and everyone here is a host who knows how to host quality games. Literally, everyone who is scheduled to go is super experienced at hosting so supervision's not necessary for now. Though, I definitely do discourage people from trying to queue their games before they've finished or at the very least are halfway through with their setup. Saying "I will be finished by then" doesn't count. With that being said, @Ariess unless your Yu-Gi-Oh game fits those parameters, I can't let you try to queue a spot in September for it.
.
Mashiro Blue
π¦π²πΌπ± πΎπΉπΈπ· πͺ πΌπ±πΈπΈπ½π²π·π° πΌπ½πͺπ» β°
β
Mashiro Blue
π¦π²πΌπ± πΎπΉπΈπ· πͺ πΌπ±πΈπΈπ½π²π·π° πΌπ½πͺπ» β°
β
Mashiro Blue
π¦π²πΌπ± πΎπΉπΈπ· πͺ πΌπ±πΈπΈπ½π²π·π° πΌπ½πͺπ» β°
β
Pretty sure he's serious, ekko tried to do a X-Men vs avengers game on nf with 40 players. We kept telling him that wasn't possible so make the set up smaller but he was adamant about the size. The game was never made. Sometimes you need to have realistic approach on what's possible and what's reaching
- Status