Status
Not open for further replies.
Low-key was bummed out by her claim because I knew we wouldn't have Ekko vs Flower anymore. Was hoping for that entertainment too. :pepehands:

But that still doesn't really explain why you need to wait for them to argue before you vote him.
ok real talk, im not voting him either way unless my current read on him changes
doesnt matter whether they argue or not, dont know y u r taking a joke so seriously
kinda comes off as ur trying to create some "aha!" thing against me
 
I am very dismissive person 😜

You will find out if anyone else caught my eye

I already showed my intention regarding light. To build further I need to see how light plays

I don't mind you find me and I quote "little ehh". It's good that you read me like this.

But your posts seem like piggy backing ekko and drago.

Rolled scum this game, hime?
care to elaborate?
 

Light D Lamperouge

𝖂𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝕮𝖔𝖚𝖑𝖉 𝕳𝖆𝖛𝖊 𝕭𝖊𝖊𝖓
y should i be interested in that?
Why wouldn't you be? Unless you have TMI. As a townie you should have no idea on Ekko's alignment, so no reason not to comply. Especially since you also had no way to read him, as he did not post up to that point, I believe.
 
Anybody else get fool vibes from Pero?
Doesn't feel like a jester for me

werent we both town in BB
Yea it was 2 games where i read u as scum, u just trying to dismiss it to spite or sth is funny to me lol

Vote Count:

Drago: Ekko > Pero.
Light: Ekko > Pero.
Pero: Ekko
Melkor: Ekko > Rottkins
Rottkins: Ekko
Ekko: Wris > Melkor
Wris: Pero
Flowa: Pero

Pero: 4.
Ekko: 2.
Melkor/Rottkins: 1.
I also voted pero, but yea if we need to stick to this we need more votes
 
Vote Count:

Drago: Ekko > Melkor > Pero.
Light: Ekko > Pero.
Pero: Ekko
Melkor: Ekko > Rottkins
Rottkins: Ekko > Pero.
Ekko: Wris > Melkor
Wris: Pero
Flowa: Pero
Nana: Pero

Pero: 6.
Ekko/Melkor/Rottkins: 1.

Now it should be accurate lol.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top