Questions & Mysteries Why do you just assume Sanji defeated Page One?
- Thread starter ShishioIsBack
- Start date
- Tags episode 925 page1 raid suit sanji
not necessarily.
1) it is possible page1 is not among the f6 that are present at the banquet (this point will be decided next chapter most likely, when we actually get a reveal on all of them)
2) Even if page1 is among them, that doesnt mean sanji didnt defeat him, only that he wasnt able to defeat/injure him in a way where he cant fight in the war.
1) it is possible page1 is not among the f6 that are present at the banquet (this point will be decided next chapter most likely, when we actually get a reveal on all of them)
2) Even if page1 is among them, that doesnt mean sanji didnt defeat him, only that he wasnt able to defeat/injure him in a way where he cant fight in the war.
Not necessarily.
Entire Sanji has defeated Page One had a very minor evidence to begin with, it was an overwhelming amount of benefit of the doubt given to Sanji.
Then we started calling anime unreliable despite the fact that in the past Wano anime has been reliable in predicting a spoiler showing inside knowledge and now Page One is back or at least it is implied all flying six are back.
So even if we go by the assumption we don't know if P1 recovered, if the entire basis is taking sanjis words, he also claimed he'd reduce enemy numbers and he failed in that regard regardless which implies sanjis word is not reliable.
Entire Sanji has defeated Page One had a very minor evidence to begin with, it was an overwhelming amount of benefit of the doubt given to Sanji.
Then we started calling anime unreliable despite the fact that in the past Wano anime has been reliable in predicting a spoiler showing inside knowledge and now Page One is back or at least it is implied all flying six are back.
So even if we go by the assumption we don't know if P1 recovered, if the entire basis is taking sanjis words, he also claimed he'd reduce enemy numbers and he failed in that regard regardless which implies sanjis word is not reliable.
Sure, there is no hard evidence for sanji defeating page one. But also no hard evidence for the contrary.
The anime was always unreliable and is irrelevant when it comes to discussing the canon manga. Do i need to post the shit that i shared with you on discord recently again?
Depends.
If point 1 that i mentioned above applies:
then sanji did reduce enemy numbers and his word was not unreliable in this case
The anime was always unreliable and is irrelevant when it comes to discussing the canon manga. Do i need to post the shit that i shared with you on discord recently again?
Depends.
If point 1 that i mentioned above applies:
then sanji did reduce enemy numbers and his word was not unreliable in this case
That is rather weird way of argumentation especially coming from someone like you who is already well aware of this.
When you make a positive claim such as a moderately significant character being defeat the burden of proof falls on you such as Manga evidence, statements etc, and not the side challenging your claim.
Burden of proof falls on one claiming Sanji was defeated not the one challenging such notion.
When you make a positive claim such as a moderately significant character being defeat the burden of proof falls on you such as Manga evidence, statements etc, and not the side challenging your claim.
Burden of proof falls on one claiming Sanji was defeated not the one challenging such notion.
