My Problem with femminist media types
- Thread starter Bob74h
- Start date
I was not targeting @Uncle Van . I was just using his reply as an example, his opinion is average in fact. That's just confusionist BS we can easily see anywhere in society and this forum starting with this thread's creator. No need to reply to me because I replied to you Van. I was speaking to everyone.
Men also suffered from sexism for thousands of years, why did these fuckers have to get up everyday to work just because they're men
Why were they sent to war while women just stayed behind
Why did the man have to build a house provide support and develop a network along with all other bullshit standards.
So what I think you're doing is completely ignoring the other side of the coin, as if men do this shit for granted. But yeah let's hear it, how do you differentiate malding sexism from natural sexism
Do you consider nature as sexist because a man has a dick and a woman has a vagina? Are you gonna mald about that too?
Why were they sent to war while women just stayed behind
Why did the man have to build a house provide support and develop a network along with all other bullshit standards.
So what I think you're doing is completely ignoring the other side of the coin, as if men do this shit for granted. But yeah let's hear it, how do you differentiate malding sexism from natural sexism
Do you consider nature as sexist because a man has a dick and a woman has a vagina? Are you gonna mald about that too?
Patriarchy is not just about women, it's about men as well. The suffering of male as result of the sexist society IS A PROBLEM TOO.
The thing is, you can't call it "sexism" against male, because - sociologicaly - it's not the same things.
Sexism is a sociological concept. You can't just apply that to say "there is sexism against men because they went to war". That's not how it works.
Those thing you are righfully denouncing are here because the society is englued in patriarchy:
Men went to war because men first forbide women to go for it.
Learn that before the invention of agriculture, there was more equality between men and women. Everything came because someone with power started to divide ressource improperly and in a sexist way. That's the whole thing about the beginning of sedenterization
So you got your answer.. How to fight inequality ?
By fighting the power.
By understanding your sexist bias.
By understanding that you are born in a sexist society
And by doing something to fight it.
Calm down dudes, there is enough media for everyone, if you dont like mha then go watch something else, whatever.
Also who the fuck gives a shit about the ``feminist`` media, do you think that the author of mha will stop drawing girls just because a random from youtube has a video about how he ``should`` draw his manga, lol
Drawing cute girls is the meta in 2022, those who complain can only seethe, mald & cope.
Also who the fuck gives a shit about the ``feminist`` media, do you think that the author of mha will stop drawing girls just because a random from youtube has a video about how he ``should`` draw his manga, lol
Drawing cute girls is the meta in 2022, those who complain can only seethe, mald & cope.
Here's where I lose you, you think your average man wants war? That's extremely sexist.
The issue is you literally state the cause of war yet still frame it as sexism, what a dumb conclusion.
This is a class war, always was and will remain so. In your own words "someone with power", that someone can have either a dick or a cunt between their legs it doesn't matter, they're both gonna fuck you in the ass in real time.
Patriarchy, what in heaven's name is that. Most women have their partner by the balls at any given occasion lmao
Modern society is no way patriarchal.
The issue is you literally state the cause of war yet still frame it as sexism, what a dumb conclusion.
This is a class war, always was and will remain so. In your own words "someone with power", that someone can have either a dick or a cunt between their legs it doesn't matter, they're both gonna fuck you in the ass in real time.
Patriarchy, what in heaven's name is that. Most women have their partner by the balls at any given occasion lmao
Modern society is no way patriarchal.
It's not "sexist" it's just bad. Let me remind you that women are still retain from position of power in the context of war.
Like I said, Men went to war because men first forbide women to go for it. (Not yersteday, THOUSAND OF YEARS AGO)
The fact that men are still repeating that cycle today IS the sexist thing. If you want to fight inequality, fight for women. Not men.
I never stated the cause of war, I explained were inequality between men and women started from: Power, bigotery and sexism.
Class war start with feminism.
No. Just no.
Patriarchy is a sociological concept, you know ? Science.
It is. And until you see that, you won't understand feminism.
Like I said, Men went to war because men first forbide women to go for it. (Not yersteday, THOUSAND OF YEARS AGO)
The fact that men are still repeating that cycle today IS the sexist thing. If you want to fight inequality, fight for women. Not men.
I never stated the cause of war, I explained were inequality between men and women started from: Power, bigotery and sexism.
Class war start with feminism.
No. Just no.
Patriarchy is a sociological concept, you know ? Science.
It is. And until you see that, you won't understand feminism.
Calm down dudes, there is enough media for everyone, if you dont like mha then go watch something else, whatever.
Also who the fuck gives a shit about the ``feminist`` media, do you think that the author of mha will stop drawing girls just because a random from youtube has a video about how he ``should`` draw his manga, lol
Drawing cute girls is the meta in 2022, those who complain can only seethe, mald & cope.
Also who the fuck gives a shit about the ``feminist`` media, do you think that the author of mha will stop drawing girls just because a random from youtube has a video about how he ``should`` draw his manga, lol
Drawing cute girls is the meta in 2022, those who complain can only seethe, mald & cope.
Oh boy.
Men going to war and not women is actually a result of natural selection.
Because back then when there were no civillizations, our kin instinctively left young boys in care of fathers and young girls in care of mothers.
Strong females were able to aid men or scout for territory because they tend to be faster. But the hunt and warfare were always left to men, and the tribal women and children were the "reward" and added to your group.
Why is that so? Naturally due to the chromosomic differences, more females than males are getting born. And all the young girls were together with the mothers. In a low density population/tribe the men were still the strongest and thus eligible for warfare and territorial expansion.
So yeah it was always like this, men were warfaring since ever. Women did not fight, they were not even oppressing the men.
To go back to the current time you can see the reflection of this instinctive behaviour because global pressure and opressing structures are holding men back from living their warfaring nature which causes a huge range of side effects. And here we are now women trying to oppress us, not a majority, maybe this is a minority. But there is a certain vocality that just isn't healthy. I'd prefer women siding with us to dimnish this vocality and restore a certain balance before we talk further, else men and women go circles for the next generations.
Men going to war and not women is actually a result of natural selection.
Because back then when there were no civillizations, our kin instinctively left young boys in care of fathers and young girls in care of mothers.
Strong females were able to aid men or scout for territory because they tend to be faster. But the hunt and warfare were always left to men, and the tribal women and children were the "reward" and added to your group.
Why is that so? Naturally due to the chromosomic differences, more females than males are getting born. And all the young girls were together with the mothers. In a low density population/tribe the men were still the strongest and thus eligible for warfare and territorial expansion.
So yeah it was always like this, men were warfaring since ever. Women did not fight, they were not even oppressing the men.
To go back to the current time you can see the reflection of this instinctive behaviour because global pressure and opressing structures are holding men back from living their warfaring nature which causes a huge range of side effects. And here we are now women trying to oppress us, not a majority, maybe this is a minority. But there is a certain vocality that just isn't healthy. I'd prefer women siding with us to dimnish this vocality and restore a certain balance before we talk further, else men and women go circles for the next generations.