- Status
@Reborn
Games featuring claims mechanics should be taken in a lighter way hence no lynch on D1 is the best scenario, at least generally. Games that are strict claims-wise should be taken differently in that you won't gather the same amount of info the next day.
However it has to be said that even in a no claims game players still have a way to channel Town into a specific lynch target by casting a vote at the beginning of the phase if a key result was found at night. In that case the player obviously doesn't mention that "he is something or has found something", but simply castes a vote.
There's basically no existing game in which results don't matter at all.
I would be cautious about lynching for such reason, but at the same time my read on Bogard still stands as TAC never really slipped: reading OP and missing a part of it =/= slip, yet he insisted on that part and still does.
Still I would like to hear more from Rej and other inactives before making up my mind, since there's too much inactivity thus far and this is always a worrisome sign, so the chance different scums are hiding is high.
I also am noticing incongruence in Don's behaviour from his meta, he is driving attention off himself.
Games featuring claims mechanics should be taken in a lighter way hence no lynch on D1 is the best scenario, at least generally. Games that are strict claims-wise should be taken differently in that you won't gather the same amount of info the next day.
However it has to be said that even in a no claims game players still have a way to channel Town into a specific lynch target by casting a vote at the beginning of the phase if a key result was found at night. In that case the player obviously doesn't mention that "he is something or has found something", but simply castes a vote.
There's basically no existing game in which results don't matter at all.
I would be cautious about lynching for such reason, but at the same time my read on Bogard still stands as TAC never really slipped: reading OP and missing a part of it =/= slip, yet he insisted on that part and still does.
Still I would like to hear more from Rej and other inactives before making up my mind, since there's too much inactivity thus far and this is always a worrisome sign, so the chance different scums are hiding is high.
I also am noticing incongruence in Don's behaviour from his meta, he is driving attention off himself.
2 possibilities :
if we no lynch : during night 1 the town will be weaker because people won't really know who to target or help. But for day 2 : giving who died, former interactions and new reactions we will be able to have informations.
The disadvantage of lynching one is the mislynch. Killing a townie for free. And the disadvantage of no lynch is during night 1 town will be at a disadvantage.
If we lynch : if there is a lynch, the death will give us informations about the game and we will be able to read former interactions better and so during night one people will be able to act in a better way. But there is a risk of mislynch.
I think giving it is the begining we can wait day 2 to have a real opinion and avoid the myslynch. But I am still open to debate.
if we no lynch : during night 1 the town will be weaker because people won't really know who to target or help. But for day 2 : giving who died, former interactions and new reactions we will be able to have informations.
The disadvantage of lynching one is the mislynch. Killing a townie for free. And the disadvantage of no lynch is during night 1 town will be at a disadvantage.
If we lynch : if there is a lynch, the death will give us informations about the game and we will be able to read former interactions better and so during night one people will be able to act in a better way. But there is a risk of mislynch.
I think giving it is the begining we can wait day 2 to have a real opinion and avoid the myslynch. But I am still open to debate.
Id prefer a no lynch on the basis we may be wrong if someones sure then im not against it. But it can put us on the wrong foot.
As for sus honestly dont have a clue but if you want a name id say bogard probably, i know you said it was just a pressure tactic but hes still kept at it and is willing to vote tac for something so innocuous. I even asked around and most agreed he had no real basis to do so. So whilst it aint much hes the most sus for me but like i said i dont have that much of an idea.
As for sus honestly dont have a clue but if you want a name id say bogard probably, i know you said it was just a pressure tactic but hes still kept at it and is willing to vote tac for something so innocuous. I even asked around and most agreed he had no real basis to do so. So whilst it aint much hes the most sus for me but like i said i dont have that much of an idea.
- Status