Muugen quotes the post as responds "Ratchet". Q.E.D Muugen is trying to posture around my potential wagon by hoping those less engaged will believe his claims without evidence. Not a bad strategy, in SRM.
In context, Muugen was trying to move votes away from TAC to put them on me. I obviously know my alignment, and assuming that vote manipulation is in play (my vote was silenced last phase) if 5 or so joined the wagon with him it easily could have swung from TAC.
Here you go @MUUGEN
Watson asks which of Conq or Mango have the most damning evidence against them. In this context, "damning evidence" pertains to mech.
Muugen quotes the post as responds "Ratchet". Q.E.D Muugen is trying to posture around my potential wagon by hoping those less engaged will believe his claims without evidence. Not a bad strategy, in SRM.
In context, Muugen was trying to move votes away from TAC to put them on me. I obviously know my alignment, and assuming that vote manipulation is in play (my vote was silenced last phase) if 5 or so joined the wagon with him it easily could have swung from TAC.
I dont wanna be the policy lyncher when it comes to subs but I don't think anyone who subbed into this game proved their alignment and gave a reason to not be taken out.
MuuTwo included.
That isn't the point. You were asked "who has the most damning evidence" and then tried to sell a case you have been unable to make. Given that TAC has flipped scum, it looks pretty bad to me. For all the trash talk you give to say, Flower, relying on mech here will b pretty much the only defence you can muster. Better hope Prof clears you otherwise chances are, my kill is going your way tonight.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.