Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
That's what we call a big strawman.
Usually, people who denounce stuff in media don't do it because of one instance. Most of the time, if not always, it is done because of a systemic redoundance and with multiple examples. In short, a repetition that actually portray X people as X repeatitively. Instilling the idea that X people are X. when they are not.
In those for case its black people being portrayed systematically as:
- Villain
- Non relevant
- Savage
- Invisible
The reality is that people won't say "ho they did that, it's racist *angry face*", they will tend to say instead:
"ho they did that.. again.. which taken as a all just show a systemisation of racism in the industry...*sigh*".. But of course, strawman are always simpler than the reality.
Note that none of those example show people being angry because the little mermaid or the fairy from peter pan is black or the fact that April is black or stuff usual conservative and the alt right protesters tends to do on twitter. This little strip is only aimed at people who denounce racist treatment in media.
In short, this little comic strip just portray a conservative way of looking at people who denounce legitimately racial problematics in media.
Funny how a little comic strip can be so telling of the one who uses them.. Don't you think ?
Usually, people who denounce stuff in media don't do it because of one instance. Most of the time, if not always, it is done because of a systemic redoundance and with multiple examples. In short, a repetition that actually portray X people as X repeatitively. Instilling the idea that X people are X. when they are not.
In those for case its black people being portrayed systematically as:
- Villain
- Non relevant
- Savage
- Invisible
The reality is that people won't say "ho they did that, it's racist *angry face*", they will tend to say instead:
"ho they did that.. again.. which taken as a all just show a systemisation of racism in the industry...*sigh*".. But of course, strawman are always simpler than the reality.
Note that none of those example show people being angry because the little mermaid or the fairy from peter pan is black or the fact that April is black or stuff usual conservative and the alt right protesters tends to do on twitter. This little strip is only aimed at people who denounce racist treatment in media.
In short, this little comic strip just portray a conservative way of looking at people who denounce legitimately racial problematics in media.
Funny how a little comic strip can be so telling of the one who uses them.. Don't you think ?
Last edited:
Yup, the reality is that the left already knows that there is a systemic problem of racial representation in media, that's nothing new for us.
So the fact that people portray us as angry when we are just is *sigh* mode in front of the already preexisting content.. is just funny when we see that in that very thread just a couple of post away, people are complaining because of a character being black.
So the fact that people portray us as angry when we are just is *sigh* mode in front of the already preexisting content.. is just funny when we see that in that very thread just a couple of post away, people are complaining because of a character being black.
Of course it is. Black representation is media is a real issue. We have a lot a black people in the world but their representation are shallow. They need - just like everyone - strong representation or at least not normative ones.
I'm talking about black people here but it's the same for any minorities.
I'm talking about black people here but it's the same for any minorities.
Homosexuals have existed for thousands of years. There is concrete proof of Greek civilization consisting of homosexuals.
Transgenders have existed for thousands of years. Son of Indra, Arjun, disguised himself as a transgender for an entire year and no one discriminated against him for this.
Stop falling for American propaganda.
Is this ironic? I'm usually good at recognizing sarcasm but I can't figure out this one.
Transgenders have existed for thousands of years. Son of Indra, Arjun, disguised himself as a transgender for an entire year and no one discriminated against him for this.
Stop falling for American propaganda.
Post automatically merged:
That's what we call a big strawman.
Usually, people who denounce stuff in media don't do it because of one instance. Most of the time, if not always, it is done because of a systemic redoundance and with multiple examples. In short, a repetition that actually portray X people as X repeatitively. Instilling the idea that X people are X. when they are not.
In those for case its black people being portrayed systematically as:
- Villain
- Non relevant
- Savage
- Invisible
The reality is that people won't say "ho they did that, it's racist *angry face*", they will tend to say instead:
"ho they did that.. again.. which taken as a all just show a systemisation of racism in the industry...*sigh*".. But of course, strawman are always simpler than the reality.
Note that none of those example show people being angry because the little mermaid or the fairy from peter pan is black or the fact that April is black or stuff usual conservative and the alt right protesters tends to do on twitter. This little strip is only aimed at people who denounce racist treatment in media.
In short, this little comic strip just portray a conservative way of looking at people who denounce legitimately racial problematics in media.
Funny how a little comic strip can be so telling of the one who uses them.. Don't you think ?
Usually, people who denounce stuff in media don't do it because of one instance. Most of the time, if not always, it is done because of a systemic redoundance and with multiple examples. In short, a repetition that actually portray X people as X repeatitively. Instilling the idea that X people are X. when they are not.
In those for case its black people being portrayed systematically as:
- Villain
- Non relevant
- Savage
- Invisible
The reality is that people won't say "ho they did that, it's racist *angry face*", they will tend to say instead:
"ho they did that.. again.. which taken as a all just show a systemisation of racism in the industry...*sigh*".. But of course, strawman are always simpler than the reality.
Note that none of those example show people being angry because the little mermaid or the fairy from peter pan is black or the fact that April is black or stuff usual conservative and the alt right protesters tends to do on twitter. This little strip is only aimed at people who denounce racist treatment in media.
In short, this little comic strip just portray a conservative way of looking at people who denounce legitimately racial problematics in media.
Funny how a little comic strip can be so telling of the one who uses them.. Don't you think ?
Bro, I'm not saying they don't exist.
What I'm saying is that there is some genetic, hormonal or mental deviation that is resulting in this.
I didn't say that because they aren't normal, do this... Nothing of that sort. I just said it isn't normal for a human to be that.
We have reached a point where we can't even acknowledge the obvious reality that by natural design, humans are meant to be comfortable of their own gender and that they're meant to be attracted to the opposite gender.
Saying this obvious biological fact leads to clowns whining, strawmanning, sperging out and mods deleting the post. Quite funny really.
We still don't have an issue acknowledging that normal design of a human includes both arms, legs and all fingers. I wonder how long that will last, by the direction we're on now.
What I'm saying is that there is some genetic, hormonal or mental deviation that is resulting in this.
I didn't say that because they aren't normal, do this... Nothing of that sort. I just said it isn't normal for a human to be that.
We have reached a point where we can't even acknowledge the obvious reality that by natural design, humans are meant to be comfortable of their own gender and that they're meant to be attracted to the opposite gender.
Saying this obvious biological fact leads to clowns whining, strawmanning, sperging out and mods deleting the post. Quite funny really.
We still don't have an issue acknowledging that normal design of a human includes both arms, legs and all fingers. I wonder how long that will last, by the direction we're on now.