Anyone else finds Andrew Tate's downfall absolutely hilarious?
- Thread starter Adam 🍎
- Start date
Well, there are a billion possibilities. I'm not gonna go out on a limb and theorize that is what happened. For now I will just take it at face value and admit that there is definitely something going on there. Whether it is the Tate brothers blackmailing/bribing them or Romanian authorities tampering with the testimonies in order to strengthen their case, it still remains to be seen.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's true
You're literally TAC's bot and so is @Mr. Reloaded
Post automatically merged:
You're literally TAC's bot and so is @Mr. Reloaded
F
This. The current world as it is heavily favors accusers.
If he really committed such things he'd be burned into the bottom of earth.
AI should be banned all over the world.
If he really committed such things he'd be burned into the bottom of earth.
I share the same sentiment
Especially since millions of jobs are about to seriously be replaced by AI
Shit nibba my job might as well
Especially since millions of jobs are about to seriously be replaced by AI
Shit nibba my job might as well
I find his existence laughable. His rhetoric and ability to divide others are frightening. His existence is a threat to young impressionable boys, I'd consider it grooming. He's installing his behavior on children and young adults. He's hijacked the incel movement and created his own subcategory.
I hope he's arrested and unable to ruin any more generations of young teens.
I hope he's arrested and unable to ruin any more generations of young teens.
F
If he did those things, he will get punished and that's it.
If not it only proves my point, but that's not only in Tate's case. Accuser is in better position in most of the cases, especially women if it involves their man or just a man who they claim did XYZ to them.
Bitch says: "I was harmed/molested/rape" and the world goes off on the guy without the trial end no matter if he did it or not.
This needs to change.
If not it only proves my point, but that's not only in Tate's case. Accuser is in better position in most of the cases, especially women if it involves their man or just a man who they claim did XYZ to them.
Bitch says: "I was harmed/molested/rape" and the world goes off on the guy without the trial end no matter if he did it or not.
This needs to change.
Im nothing like TAC
@Bob74h is an ai account too
so is
@CarrotForNakama
F
I know. Although I'm always in favor of seeing it all thru to the end instead of jumping to the gun.
Don't take me wrong. I just don't favor "XYZ did to me" no matter if it's women or men.
Proof should always be there.
This will sound as if I read that thread about women having the benefit of the doubt but sometimes it do be like that.
When you hear rape/molesting allegations you always tend to feel bad for the woman first until you get it proven otherwise.
World courts need regulations to heavily punish accusers who do it without proof or out of dislike for the other side.
If the allegations are proven. Go with the mfker or whoever it is down to hell.
Don't take me wrong. I just don't favor "XYZ did to me" no matter if it's women or men.
Proof should always be there.
This will sound as if I read that thread about women having the benefit of the doubt but sometimes it do be like that.
When you hear rape/molesting allegations you always tend to feel bad for the woman first until you get it proven otherwise.
World courts need regulations to heavily punish accusers who do it without proof or out of dislike for the other side.
If the allegations are proven. Go with the mfker or whoever it is down to hell.
We all have our biases. And I understand the sentiment of punishing those who make up lies. It's just incredibly difficult to come up with a way to do that. There might be a guy that gets away with doing so and then what? do we punish the innocent girl that lost the case? I'd rather have a criminal in the streets than an innocent person in jail.
