Controversial General Political Discussion

[Ultra]

You’re the one who immediately accused me of making it about the church, buddy…

…whereas I was more focused on the child rape aspect, something you’re STILL not actually condemning in any meaningful way.

No, I didn't *immediately* accuse you, I said that after you made it pretty clear what your angle was (and is).

Again, in the post I was responding to, you made a specific request which I responded to. You are now saying "well I was more focused on the Catholic Church anyway"

...which is moving the goalpost, by your very own admission. What do you expect from me? To read your mind that you *actually* meant something different than what you typed?

I’ve only ever seen you proselytize about Jesus on this forum

What in the everloving fuck are you talking about? I've never done this once.

You're obviously arguing with a ghost. You're hallucinating. I've made my point.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

No, I didn't *immediately* accuse you, I said that after you made it pretty clear what your angle was (and is).

Again, in the post I was responding to, you made a specific request which I responded to. You are now saying "well I was more focused on the Catholic Church anyway"

...which is moving the goalpost, hence my point.

What in the everloving fuck are you talking about?

You're obviously arguing with a ghost. You're hallucinating. I've made my point.

That one is my bad, I had you confused with Udell for a second. As far as the rest, the goalposts never moved, I’ve been saying that your single case just isn’t the same as the thing I posted. If you still think 600 is equal to one, or that “both sides” is an acceptable defense when the ratio skews so heavily towards one of them, then I don’t believe you really have a grasp on the situation and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

 

[Ultra]

are you sure you actually addressed it?
because in my books, you didnt address shit

Hm...yeah I'm pretty sure I did.

I'm avoiding his bipolar accusations of defending a point I never made to begin with, because he's clearly doing the forum equivalent of a shower argument - he's not even reading or comprehending my posts.

I've got nothing to hide, I'm doing this for my own amusement.

That one is my bad, I had you confused with Udell for a second. As far as the rest, the goalposts never moved, I’ve been saying that your single case just isn’t the same as the thing I posted. If you still think 600 is equal to one, or that “both sides” is an acceptable defense when the ratio skews so heavily towards one of them, then I don’t believe you really have a grasp on the situation and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Once again, neither of these are positions *I made*. They're positions you're trying to force upon me after I already satisfied your request for an example.

You: I challenge someone to provide me a single example of-

Me: Here's an example

You: HOW DARE YOU PROVIDE THIS EXAMPLE YOU MAGA HAT WEARING JESUS FREAK

 

[Akai2]

This thread is meant to discuss anything and everything relating politics.

Oh OK, I guess we now have an unmoderated politics thread. They surely learnt from the shitshow that was the Election 2020 thread that politics talk with rules will never work. Free for all it is!!!

• Respect each other.

• Don't go overboard.

• Stop if you're told to.

Guess I know where I'll be getting my break week entertainment

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Free for all it is!!!

Free for all is a complete understatement here

Enjoy though

 

[Uncle Van]

Oh OK, I guess we now have an unmoderated politics thread. They surely learnt from the shitshow that was the Election 2020 thread that politics talk with rules will never work. Free for all it is!!!

Guess I know where I'll be getting my break week entertainment

Oh no no no no it ain't unmoderated(I think). I at least am just waiting for someone to go overboard so I can ban them 😇

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

I at least am just waiting for someone to go overboard so I can ban them 😇

@CarrotForNakama hasn't gone overboard yet?

 

[Akai2]

Free for all is a complete understatement here

Enjoy though

418 pages in 3 months? And I checked the who replied fully expecting a heavy dose of C4N.......and guess what

Oh no no no no it ain't unmoderated(I think). I at least am just waiting for someone to go overboard so I can ban them 😇

My brotha, believe me if a politics thread reached 418 pages it's unmodded. If y'all really looked close enough every single dude on the who replied would've been banned by now

 

[Seatonnes]

Oh no no no no it ain't unmoderated

disagree

 

[Uncle Van]

@CarrotForNakama hasn't gone overboard yet?

In regards to the world of politics, no lol. This aint the nakama thread where he constantly went off topic

418 pages in 3 months? And I checked the who replied fully expecting a heavy dose of C4N.......and guess what

My brotha, believe me if a politics thread reached 418 pages it's unmodded. If y'all really looked close enough every single dude on the who replied would've been banned by now

I said I think for a reason lol. This thread is to keep all the poltical cesspool here. Not that many have went on death threats, racist/xenophobic rants etc which surprised me.

 

[Toby D. Dog]

In regards to the world of politics, no lol. This aint the nakama thread where he constantly went off topic



I said I think for a reason lol. This thread is to keep all the poltical cesspool here. Not that many have went on death threats, racist/xenophobic rants etc which surprised me.

No, we’re replacing those with transphobia and homophobia. Those are more in fashion nowadays.

 

[Uncle Van]

No, we’re replacing those with transphobia and homophobia. Those are more in fashion nowadays.

Buzzwords like that are thrown around so easily and often that it doesn't mean shit anymore. A straight guy can say he's not sexually attracted to male genitalia and get labeled a phobe of some kind lol.

 

[Seatonnes]

Buzzwords like that are thrown around so easily and often that it doesn't mean shit anymore. A straight guy can say he's not sexually attracted to male genitalia and get labeled a phobe of some kind lol.

Calling homosexuality a mental disorder is homophobia

stop acting crjnge

 

[Toby D. Dog]

Buzzwords like that are thrown around so easily and often that it doesn't mean shit anymore. A straight guy can say he's not sexually attracted to male genitalia and get labeled a phobe of some kind lol.

Bro, have you been keeping up with the thread? If some of the stuff that’s been said in here does not qualify as homophobia to you, then idk what would.

 

[bennbeckman]

Guns should be regulated

Do examinations, get license, get a gun

Simple and easy as that.

If only the US did that LOL

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

If only the US did that LOL

B-but muh freedom!

 

[Toby D. Dog]

B-but muh freedom!

That’s right brother, don’t give in to these gay communists.

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

That’s right brother, don’t give in to these gay communists.

 

[Hamlette]

You know as the saying goes, "there are no gays in a house fire".....................*wait no that doesn't sound right*.

 

[Logiko]

Buzzwords like that are thrown around so easily and often that it doesn't mean shit anymore. A straight guy can say he's not sexually attracted to male genitalia and get labeled a phobe of some kind lol.

sigh