Questions & Mysteries Is advanced CoC really only no touching?

No He didn't touch King, He launched a Haki Hame Ha on him, you can see CoC coming out of King's Body.

Its almost like Zoro shot a Kame Ha Me Ha wave of Haki and nearly punched a hole in King's Body with it.
A Kamehaha that physically cut King.. So it touched.. I don't see how it can not touch.. The goal of a Swordsman aiming for the WSS is to always touch with cut or without..
 
Good point one is defensive the other offensive.. They say the best defense is offense.. But how does that apply when you mix an offensive capability with a defensive capability?.. At this point in the story, i'd say you can not use CoA Emission when you're attacking or punching..

:zorothink:
Post automatically merged:


Like i said, if there was ID CoA in the mix it would have been bigger, not as large as Garp or Luffy's Bajrang gun but still..


AdCoC + Internal Destruction is as blowing a balloon.. Where as AdCoC is pushing on a small pillow or cushion.. Do you see the difference?..
You’re such an idiot when old man hyo showed Luffy emission coa he was attacking
 
Because they have no contextual or narrative importance.. The reveal of Luffy's AdCoC is what matters..



Then it's only CoA Emission level 2 no touch.. Which is inferior to Internal Destruction CoA Level 3 '' touch ''..
You do not
Need to touch to
Use internal destruction . Luffy destroyed the tree in 955 without touching it
 
Where is it stated that a swordsman must touch?
Logic stated it.. And since every story is based on Logic, it's stated everywhere in the Manga..

You do not
Need to touch to
Use internal destruction . Luffy destroyed the tree in 955 without touching it
You do need to touch.. That was just for his Training.. Imagine if Luffy stood in front of Kaido like the tree
and flow Haki in Kaido.. He would have got blasted away instantly.. That's why you need to touch when you use
Internal Desctruction CoA, it's an offensive attack.. Red Roc would not have made any damage if Luffy didn't have motion
added to it..
 
Yes it does. You act like ACoC is only no touch and therefore not suited for swordsmen. But it actually isn’t thats why you should consider rereading the whole thread.
You really think i will reread the whole Thread?.. I got better things to do.. lol

Ok, but what's the point of Swordsmanship if not to touch?..
 
You really think i will reread the whole Thread?.. I got better things to do.. lol

Ok, but what's the point of Swordsmanship if not to touch?..
Just my first post of this thread not the whole comments.

Like I said earlier the no touch bubble is not a criteria. Look at Kaidos Ragnaroku, look at kaidos no name acoc attack on kinemon. Look st luffy snakeman culverin which hit kaido in the face or yamatos charge against kaido. They all hit the opponents even with ACoC
 
Top