Shanks leader of RHP at 27 yo only has 1.042 b berries while Jack at 28 despite not an underling had 1 b beeries. Funny thing was Shanks 1.42 b berries was because he stole Uta's bounty.
Being a captain means you have a higher bounty is never stated in the manga. You're pulling that headcannon out of nowhere.
Captains get highly inflated bounties because they get blamed for the whole incident instead of their own fights. It's a well known fact. That's the reason why pre-skip Luffy had a bigger bounty than post-skip Zoro for a major part of the new world despite the fact that out of the TS Zoro's like 20 times stronger than pre-skip Luffy.
Captains get highly inflated bounties because they get blamed for the whole incident instead of their own fights. It's a well known fact. That's the reason why pre-skip Luffy had a bigger bounty than post-skip Zoro for a major part of the new world despite the fact that out of the TS Zoro's like 20 times stronger than pre-skip Luffy.
He's far stronger and a pirate making him a bigger threat than pre-skip Luffy. Bounties are decided based on how big a threat you are, not based on how many people you beat. If you beat a YC1 without ever touching a soul before, you'd still get a bounty close to 1 billion.
Buggy asking Mihawk to fight for his PK dreams is like me asking Di Caprio to act in my film. Thats the response he gave, basically you expect me to fight for you? type stuff.
There's a reason why there's a panel of Mihawk saying he's not interested in the title. Because he'd be getting the title by default. No amount of getting mad and dancing around it is gonna help you prove anything otherwise.
Captains get highly inflated bounties because they get blamed for the whole incident instead of their own fights. It's a well known fact. That's the reason why pre-skip Luffy had a bigger bounty than post-skip Zoro for a major part of the new world despite the fact that out of the TS Zoro's like 20 times stronger than pre-skip Luffy.
Captain Shanks who stole Uta's bounty at 27 yo had 1.042 b berries while underling Jack at 28 yo without stealing a bounty had 1 b berries destroys this argument.
Being a captain/subordinate is irrelevant to bounty.
Subordinates bounties are inflated by a captain. Captain's bounty is never inflated by a subordinate. Zoro majority had 320 m berries because he did not have the time until Wano to get his new bounty. Just like Chinjao was passive so his bounty did not increase despite with his strength, had he more active he could have gotten higher bounty
He's far stronger and a pirate making him a bigger threat than pre-skip Luffy. Bounties are decided based on how big a threat you are, not based on how many people you beat. If you beat a YC1 without ever touching a soul before, you'd still get a bounty close to 1 billion.
Also Zoro bounty gets inflated because he's Luffy’s underling
Let's take away 50M from DR , 300M from Wano and other millions he got for just being Strawhat as bonus
His bounty wouldn't be even 700M by now
Also Zoro bounty gets inflated because he's Luffy’s underling
Let's take away 50M from DR , 300M from Wano and other millions he got for just being Strawhat as bonus
His bounty wouldn't be even 700M by now
Never said otherwise. It's just that captains get more inflations due to the whole incidents being credited to their head. Luffy gets blamed for the whole EL incident while Zoro only receives a bounty for beating Kaku and for being Luffy's underling. That's the difference b/w the two.
Captain Shanks who stole Uta's bounty at 27 yo had 1.042 b berries while underling Jack at 28 yo without stealing a bounty had 1 b berries destroys this argument.
Being a captain/subordinate is irrelevant to bounty.
Subordinates bounties are inflated by a captain. Captain's bounty is never inflated by a subordinate. Zoro majority had 320 m berries because he did not have the time until Wano to get his new bounty. Just like Chinjao was passive so his bounty did not increase despite with his strength, had he more active he could have gotten higher bounty
It depends on the characters. Not every captain has a higher bounty than an underling, but every captain has a more inflated bounty that your average underling. You're confusing one with another.
Never said otherwise. It's just that captains get more inflations due to the whole incidents being credited to their head. Luffy gets blamed for the whole EL incident while Zoro only receives a bounty for beating Kaku and for being Luffy's underling. That's the difference b/w the two.
Post automatically merged:
It depends on the characters. Not every captain has a higher bounty than an underling, but every captain has a more inflated bounty that your average underling. You're confusing one with another.
Luffy beat Lucci who is almost 2 times strnger than Kaku. He also beat Blueno.
After Wano, narrator clearly states that Luffy, Law and Kidd had 3 b berries bounties because they beat Kaido and Big Mom. Not because they're the core leaders who infiltrated Wano
Why 27 yo captain Shanks who stole Uta's bounty had 1.042 b berries while underling Jack at 28 yo without stealing a bounty had 1 b berries if being a captain means you have a higher bounty?
It depends on the characters. Not every captain has a higher bounty than an underling, but every captain has a more inflated bounty that your average underling. You're confusing one with another.
No it does not. For all we know Chinjao could have been passive like Shanks who stole Uta's bounty yet only has barely higher bounty than underling Jack who did not steal a bounty.
No it does not. For all we know Chinjao could have been passive like Shanks who stole Uta's bounty yet only has barely higher bounty than underling Jack who did not steal a bounty.
Again, I did not say all underlings have lower bounties than all captains. Chinjao's no pacifist. If he was fighting Roger and Garp, then there's no reason to treat him like some small time pirate. That literally contradicts the whole point you're trying to make. Shanks is a pacifist to this day, look at what they did to his bounty when he because strong enough to become a Yonko.
No it does not. For all we know Chinjao could have been passive like Shanks who stole Uta's bounty yet only has barely higher bounty than underling Jack who did not steal a bounty.
Wiping out a Country does not warrant a billion berry bounty. Bobbins did that, and he's barely over 100 million. So I'm not sure what you're trying to get at by saying Shanks stole Uta's bounty.
Again, I did not say all underlings have lower bounties than all captains. Chinjao's no pacifist. If he was fighting Roger and Garp, then there's no reason to treat him like some small time pirate. That literally contradicts the whole point you're trying to make. Shanks is a pacifist to this day, look at what they did to his bounty when he because strong enough to become a Yonko.
Most likely Chinjao is a pacifist too. Clashing with someone does not warrant a bounty. it's when you beat someone that you can get higher bounty so it does not contradict what I said.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.