[FNZ] Super Role Madness CINEMATIC MAFIA: BATMAN
- Thread starter Ariess
- Start date
- Tags i am batman i make my own luck wheres rachel
- Status
These are your reasons for sussing me and yet you still can't throw down a vote?
1. How was my vote all over the place? I voted Melkor and then I think I changed it once more. I can't even remember where my vote ended.
2. I mean, all I asked was 'who wants to lynch Kiku'. I definitely suss you, but to call it cowardly when I have said I don't really like your slot is a bit of a stretch. Also, don't think I've ever been called a coward before. I would say this comment is more defensive than anything I've done.
3. I mean, yeah, considering the state of D1, I didn't really have a problem with Ratchet's plan to get rid of inactive. However, I voiced my disagreement going after UwU because he was a slot that hadn't even posted yet. Remind me where your vote ended up again?
4. Now this is the second time you've tried to characterize what I've done in a negative light, the first calling me a coward. I didn't demand anything from anyone, I asked someone to explain their reads further. And please define defensive to me? You called me defensive for my interaction with Melkor when I was literally the one who started the interaction with Melkor this game. I was the one who called out his lack of memory despite him wanting to suss for me an activity excuse. Never once did I care about the vote on me, I care that he had conveniently slowly backed away from his wolf read on me for what I deemed to be silly reasons. But let me guess, you'll just call this response defensive as well.
5. Come play any game with me and I always try to throw down some sort of D1 reads list, as any alignment. You have to start somewhere with reads and sometimes those reads are weak as shit, which I literally admitted to the very next post. How come you're ignoring the fact I said they were weak reads? How come you didn't ask me for any clarification on any of them? You want to call me opportunistic, but I find it opportunistic to sit there and call me a coward, say I'm defensive, and that my reads are shit, without actually trying to press, push, or vote me. Even now responding to this post, you apparently feel this strongly about my slot but have yet to do anything, you didn't even mention me in this post. It seems more like you know I'm not going to be around a lot and that you can just throw shade without consequences.
1. How was my vote all over the place? I voted Melkor and then I think I changed it once more. I can't even remember where my vote ended.
2. I mean, all I asked was 'who wants to lynch Kiku'. I definitely suss you, but to call it cowardly when I have said I don't really like your slot is a bit of a stretch. Also, don't think I've ever been called a coward before. I would say this comment is more defensive than anything I've done.
3. I mean, yeah, considering the state of D1, I didn't really have a problem with Ratchet's plan to get rid of inactive. However, I voiced my disagreement going after UwU because he was a slot that hadn't even posted yet. Remind me where your vote ended up again?
4. Now this is the second time you've tried to characterize what I've done in a negative light, the first calling me a coward. I didn't demand anything from anyone, I asked someone to explain their reads further. And please define defensive to me? You called me defensive for my interaction with Melkor when I was literally the one who started the interaction with Melkor this game. I was the one who called out his lack of memory despite him wanting to suss for me an activity excuse. Never once did I care about the vote on me, I care that he had conveniently slowly backed away from his wolf read on me for what I deemed to be silly reasons. But let me guess, you'll just call this response defensive as well.
5. Come play any game with me and I always try to throw down some sort of D1 reads list, as any alignment. You have to start somewhere with reads and sometimes those reads are weak as shit, which I literally admitted to the very next post. How come you're ignoring the fact I said they were weak reads? How come you didn't ask me for any clarification on any of them? You want to call me opportunistic, but I find it opportunistic to sit there and call me a coward, say I'm defensive, and that my reads are shit, without actually trying to press, push, or vote me. Even now responding to this post, you apparently feel this strongly about my slot but have yet to do anything, you didn't even mention me in this post. It seems more like you know I'm not going to be around a lot and that you can just throw shade without consequences.
Here, as an act of good will,, I'll use this point as one example of the several times you were factually incorrect in your little manifesto
1. You vote Melkor as a joke(after I already did, can't even make a joke without sheeping smh)
2. You vote for yourself after Rej votes for you(can't even vote for yourself without sheeping smh)
3. You vote ekko in response to muugen saying he's down to lynch ekko
4. Did not vote Indigo or Pew, but expressed willingness to vote for them when Rstchet mentions it
5. Suss me for voting ekko(lol. lmao.)
6. You change votes again to UwU because ratchet asked for it(noticing a pattern here? Baa once if yes)
7. Lastly, you switch votes to me, which is your first original thought all game... but not really, because you weren't even the first to sus me. Nor do you direct any sort of questions AT me, despite my being active
So even discounting joke votes and agreements to vote that didn't actually result in anything, thats 4 different vote changes that are clad in the clothes of a sheep
Now, I haven't the time nor inclination to repeat this process for the 4 other points you butchered, so you'll just have to live with the knowledge that you have narrowly avoided a long winded schooling
1. You vote Melkor as a joke(after I already did, can't even make a joke without sheeping smh)
2. You vote for yourself after Rej votes for you(can't even vote for yourself without sheeping smh)
3. You vote ekko in response to muugen saying he's down to lynch ekko
4. Did not vote Indigo or Pew, but expressed willingness to vote for them when Rstchet mentions it
5. Suss me for voting ekko(lol. lmao.)
6. You change votes again to UwU because ratchet asked for it(noticing a pattern here? Baa once if yes)
7. Lastly, you switch votes to me, which is your first original thought all game... but not really, because you weren't even the first to sus me. Nor do you direct any sort of questions AT me, despite my being active
So even discounting joke votes and agreements to vote that didn't actually result in anything, thats 4 different vote changes that are clad in the clothes of a sheep
Now, I haven't the time nor inclination to repeat this process for the 4 other points you butchered, so you'll just have to live with the knowledge that you have narrowly avoided a long winded schooling
- Status