i'm not talking about analogy tho that is a strawman and a contradiction of what i said
homology and analogy are about different structures without common ancestry
homoplasy and homology are about similar structures without common ancestry and with commom ancestry
DNA evidence is put forth for homology for HUman - chimp common ancestry homoplasy a counter explanations of the similarities not analogy
and i dont know crap about evolution hun?
why make a valid theoretical mechanism obsolete who said that?you're adding words in my mouth
and just coz its valid for something's it doesn't mean its valid for others. Like i said it contradicts human sociology
another pathetic attempt to wiggle out of this aye
and what happened to me denying evolution lol ?
evidence for common ancestry ?LOL
homology and analogy are about different structures without common ancestry
homoplasy and homology are about similar structures without common ancestry and with commom ancestry
DNA evidence is put forth for homology for HUman - chimp common ancestry homoplasy a counter explanations of the similarities not analogy
and i dont know crap about evolution hun?
why make a valid theoretical mechanism obsolete who said that?you're adding words in my mouth
and just coz its valid for something's it doesn't mean its valid for others. Like i said it contradicts human sociology
another pathetic attempt to wiggle out of this aye
and what happened to me denying evolution lol ?
evidence for common ancestry ?LOL
And no analogy isnt a strawman. Its just part of evolution lmao. And scientists differentiate. Similarities arent always due to homology and no one claims that. You have just a crazy limited understanding of apparently anything that plays into this. But well, you tried the "its just a theory" argument that stems from scientific illiteracy, so im not exactly surprised.
Post automatically merged:
The theory of evolution in itself is pretty solid and well established, there is little reason to doubt it. That being said, that of course doesn't prove or disprove god's existence, you could still say that evolution is a well designed system. Though I personally do not believe this to be the case. As long as god can exist seemingly without cause despite being so super complex, so can the universe be originated from a source that has no intelligence or consciousness (e.g. forces of nature).
Its kinda funny that the nutjob always talked about human-chimp ancestry when we are related to at least all eukaryotes lmao