[FNZ] Salem of Lies Town of Salem (Unofficial)
- Thread starter Reborn
- Start date
- Status
ok
so have no ground to ask a townie player to protect another one who should equally sus
you either believe his claim
or you dont.
so have no ground to ask a townie player to protect another one who should equally sus
you either believe his claim
or you dont.
Post automatically merged:
TAC is good. This is a pretty common way to verify people in the online ToS. It'll probably work here.
Well again, his "protection" is null because he's currently the easiest claim to fake. So we either believe him and go blindly or try to test him.
D
It doesn't verify shit. Why would a killing role target someone that Don revealed that he was going to protect? They would be killed. By openly deciding who to protect, you allow scums to divert around the whole thing and just not go after who Don protects. His protection is thus made useless and he is not verified. Your plan is ass.
That's the point. If this person survives, it's ultimately good for town.
If you're BG, you're protecting a townie.
If you're scum, you can't kill a townie without outing yourself.
Since we have no reason to believe your claim, this is a good way to at least assure someone is "safe". It's even better since you won't have a decision in who you protect.
You mean, why would Indie try to screw over Maf? In ToS, most if not all Indie roles need to kill EVERYONE to win. I've used this strat both ways in the online version, as Indie and as town. It works.
If you're BG, you're protecting a townie.
If you're scum, you can't kill a townie without outing yourself.
Since we have no reason to believe your claim, this is a good way to at least assure someone is "safe". It's even better since you won't have a decision in who you protect.
Post automatically merged:
You mean, why would Indie try to screw over Maf? In ToS, most if not all Indie roles need to kill EVERYONE to win. I've used this strat both ways in the online version, as Indie and as town. It works.
To what? I asked him to go through my posts, n find me posts where i sus don for same reasons, he didnt. Because there ain't, i observed Don n others after that point n quoted him when i find his posts sus.
As for vote, i was waiting to find better lynch. There more reasons, i think you could guess em. After that point, Don made Relapse claim, n i sus that, mentioned in same post i made about Rayan.
As for vote, i was waiting to find better lynch. There more reasons, i think you could guess em. After that point, Don made Relapse claim, n i sus that, mentioned in same post i made about Rayan.
alright, I see the logic behind TAC's plan. It's not all shit
my only issue is, @TheAncientCenturion are you telling Don to protect those people as to protect them from NK or to prove Don? Because at first you seem to be trying to prove Don....which is where the plan is flawed.
But if it's to protect them then sure. Also what's with the fixation on Queen or Ha001?
my only issue is, @TheAncientCenturion are you telling Don to protect those people as to protect them from NK or to prove Don? Because at first you seem to be trying to prove Don....which is where the plan is flawed.
But if it's to protect them then sure. Also what's with the fixation on Queen or Ha001?
Queen or Ha0 are arbitrary but I have zero reason to sus them, which is better than everyone currently.
The idea behind it always is;
If you are the BG, you're on a confirmed townie (or as close as we can get) and they live. If you die defending them, good job.
If they die? Well, we know you're scum. We lynch you.
Very straight forward.
The idea behind it always is;
If you are the BG, you're on a confirmed townie (or as close as we can get) and they live. If you die defending them, good job.
If they die? Well, we know you're scum. We lynch you.
Very straight forward.
- Status