It is both
You can be a dangerous person but if you don't have access to tools that can help you achieve certain acts you won't act dangerous. Harmless people are most dangerous motherfuckers in the world
But if that person can easily get a gun then they now have access to the tools and power and can enact their shit wheres previously they wouln't be able to
You can be a dangerous person but if you don't have access to tools that can help you achieve certain acts you won't act dangerous. Harmless people are most dangerous motherfuckers in the world
But if that person can easily get a gun then they now have access to the tools and power and can enact their shit wheres previously they wouln't be able to
That's illogical when one variable depends on other's sanity
Last edited: