Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Yeah.. Your are more concerned about your ego rather than being proven wrong. You literally moved you goal post and you deny it one second later. It will be hard to make you see some sence, you are not honest when you are discussing.
Sigh.. Science or rather scientific knowledge is by defaut incomplete. it doesn't means it wrong..
Sigh² I didn't mean that the subject of the consensus were facts I meant that the presences of consensus concerning those subject ARE FACTS. And no, there were no consensus of that matter in science in history.
Never said that consensus were necessaraly true don't you dare put words in my mouth. But when there is a consensus its YOU who need to prove that the consensus is wrong, not the consensus.
That's basic science.
And now YOU need to prove that gender and sex are the same.
lol
Yeah.. you don't make any sence here.
We are talking a woman that is representing women in general.. in that case, trust me.. they will have a lot to say. But you are right, a lot of women internalized their oppression and are therefore not aware of it. That's a sociologic fact.
One, that has nothing to do with our subject. Two, this is not a study. Three, a MINORITY of scientist don't agree with climate change. But climate change is a fact. Those scientist are wrong.
Try google scholar next time.
If you are a women then you are indeed well placed to talk about the live of a women.
We will go back to that later lol
What are your conservative points of view?
Most likely anarchist/technocrats. But it depends on the size, place, and age of the civilisation.
I did not vote for Merkel
H
That's exactly you hahaha. I don't care at all about being proven wrong. Just showed you when I falsely accuse you from calling me atheist.
It doesn't mean it is right either. WTF? You can't have a claim with incomplete work. You can just say it is pointing a certain way. That's why studies have the discussion section.
You literally meant that. Idk why you are trying to do mental gymnastics to end up saying tha same shit. Yes there was consensus up to 16th century.
Now you are not only denying science but also history. Just as expected from a woke.
Again you said. You are just changing your own words now that you realized how messed up your arguments were being.
And now I don't have to prove that the consensus is wrong I'm not scientist. They will be wrong no matter what I do until they change their consensus to the real one. People were wrong for centuries(milleanials may I say) about geocentrism even with people proving it to be wrong.
I don't have to prove a shit. They are the same thing. The meaning of the word is the same thing. There is no distinction of gender and sex until previously in history(less than 100 years) moved by woke agenda from very people that was slow growing but still they are minorities.
That sentence fits you so well...
Woman will never represent women in general. Lol. Not even elected politicians does. Imagine someone that wasn't even elected. And here we go again with woke agenda. If doesn't fit my argument than it's because of oppresion and not being realizing how they are supporting the wrong side. Everything I said(referring to you) is right and everything you say(referring to me) is wrong and even when you a right(me again) is because some fucked up behavior that society caused.
I had the impression that we talked about climate change in a moment. What exactly you want to be proven wrong then?
And google scholar is not the only source of knowledge. I know you woke people wants to control knowledge and do that by saying "only this source is reliable" but that is way far from true. Science borns everywhere and exists way before colleges were created.
By the way, this "not study" is an article that has studies reference by... gues what! FUCKING GOOGLE SCHOLAR! Did you even read? Are you familiar with reading things and not checking references? I think you do...
And there is nothing to be wrong about it. Just read the fucking article even a woke like you is capable of understanding. If anything for you to feel better this is about a 1995 report not current time.
[automerge]1690597593[/automerge]
Earth we live on.
Around 150 BC up to 16th century.
It doesn't mean it is right either. WTF? You can't have a claim with incomplete work. You can just say it is pointing a certain way. That's why studies have the discussion section.
You literally meant that. Idk why you are trying to do mental gymnastics to end up saying tha same shit. Yes there was consensus up to 16th century.
Now you are not only denying science but also history. Just as expected from a woke.
Again you said. You are just changing your own words now that you realized how messed up your arguments were being.
And now I don't have to prove that the consensus is wrong I'm not scientist. They will be wrong no matter what I do until they change their consensus to the real one. People were wrong for centuries(milleanials may I say) about geocentrism even with people proving it to be wrong.
I don't have to prove a shit. They are the same thing. The meaning of the word is the same thing. There is no distinction of gender and sex until previously in history(less than 100 years) moved by woke agenda from very people that was slow growing but still they are minorities.
That sentence fits you so well...
Woman will never represent women in general. Lol. Not even elected politicians does. Imagine someone that wasn't even elected. And here we go again with woke agenda. If doesn't fit my argument than it's because of oppresion and not being realizing how they are supporting the wrong side. Everything I said(referring to you) is right and everything you say(referring to me) is wrong and even when you a right(me again) is because some fucked up behavior that society caused.
I had the impression that we talked about climate change in a moment. What exactly you want to be proven wrong then?
And google scholar is not the only source of knowledge. I know you woke people wants to control knowledge and do that by saying "only this source is reliable" but that is way far from true. Science borns everywhere and exists way before colleges were created.
By the way, this "not study" is an article that has studies reference by... gues what! FUCKING GOOGLE SCHOLAR! Did you even read? Are you familiar with reading things and not checking references? I think you do...
And there is nothing to be wrong about it. Just read the fucking article even a woke like you is capable of understanding. If anything for you to feel better this is about a 1995 report not current time.
[automerge]1690597593[/automerge]
Earth we live on.
Around 150 BC up to 16th century.
