"B-but both sides are bad"
I really wonder what the justification for the constant West Bank attack is. And by justification I mean government propaganda and mental gymnastics.

No meat shields there. No Hamas. No music festival. No "40 beheaded babies".
There's no justification for it really. Apart from the "kill and displace the filthy Arabs" that they teach in schools and every other part of life over there.

White Supremacy and European colonialism has always been about "we can so we will". A truly filthy society
 
their small scale stuff didn't do much
the bulk of it was when the arabs lost the 1948 war, that's when homes were displaced and the populations spread out closer to where they are today

and no, I don't really give a shit because they lost the war that they started, plus it's in 1948 with people I have no connection with
I don't think its really fair to say that Arabs started the war when, by the words of its own founders, Zionism was explicitly a colonial movement.

Israel in practice, from its inception to present day, is based in colonialism,

Literally ever since the 40s, Palestine has been growing smaller and smaller until the people, who once were the majority in the entire region, were basically ghettoized into gaza and an archipelago of territories in the west bank.

That is exactly what the United States did to the Native Americans, taking all of the land from them and forcing them into these tiny native american reservations.


I'm not a historical scholar so I can't go in depth into what happened in the 40s and before. But knowing that the founders of zionism intended for it to be a colonial movement and seeing how Israel has behaved like a colony since its reception is enough for me say that they probably weren't ever in the right.
Post automatically merged:

And if I'm not mistaken, didn't the jewish national fund buy land from absentee landlords with the new jewish landlords subsequently kicking out the palestinian tenants?

Didn't stuff like that happen way before the war started?
Post automatically merged:

Don't think every jewish person that came to palestine wanted to be a colonizer. There were many who just wanted to live in the land and be at peace with the arabs.

But I don't believe that that was the intention of the zionist movement.
 
I don't think its really fair to say that Arabs started the war when, by the words of its own founders, Zionism was explicitly a colonial movement.

Israel in practice, from its inception to present day, is based in colonialism,

Literally ever since the 40s, Palestine has been growing smaller and smaller until the people, who once were the majority in the entire region, were basically ghettoized into gaza and an archipelago of territories in the west bank.

That is exactly what the United States did to the Native Americans, taking all of the land from them and forcing them into these tiny native american reservations.


I'm not a historical scholar so I can't go in depth into what happened in the 40s and before. But knowing that the founders of zionism intended for it to be a colonial movement and seeing how Israel has behaved like a colony since its reception is enough for me say that they probably weren't ever in the right.
Post automatically merged:

And if I'm not mistaken, didn't the jewish national fund buy land from absentee landlords with the new jewish landlords subsequently kicking out the palestinian tenants?

Didn't stuff like that happen way before the war started?
Post automatically merged:

Don't think every jewish person that came to palestine wanted to be a colonizer. There were many who just wanted to live in the land and be at peace with the arabs.

But I don't believe that that was the intention of the zionist movement.
Yes, zionism started the Aliyas. But Arabs declared war in 1948.
They weren't "gettoized" they lost a war and were displaced from their homes. Not thrown into a ghetto by the SS
 
Woke as you call them are in fact only following scientist (each and every single I follow in the militant community are linked to scientist beliefs or scientist people). Meaning that when a rightist tries to call for the help of scientist they are actually dumbfonded by their replies that is aligning with the "woke". Scientist are the source of our knowledge. Biology, archeology, sociology, anthropology, those are the things we base our knowledge on (patriarchy/feminism/Gender studies etc).

Those are facts mate. There are no logical reason for your reaction.
yeah like that study with biologists where it turned out that like 96% of them think life starts at conception. oh wait thats not the mainstream leftist position at all
Post automatically merged:

I see it more as passion, but I get your point bro. Hijab in particular employs an aggressive style and, while I am a fan of it, I can see why it might not be others' cup of tea.
both are also pretty retarded on top of their aggressive style. and especially hijab mainly does sophistry. not as bad as haqiqatjou but still. that guy at least isnt as disingenuous as the two other specialists.
Post automatically merged:

"God" is actually committing a war crime here:
"God" can do anything he wants
 
No. I treat the concept of god like a normal person and I don't know why it should be different. A personn however the power and omnipotence doesn't have the right to forfeit someone elses life and in that case, its a war crime. A real one as "god" is seen as the slayer against an oppressive people.

Its exactly what hamas did. But softly and with an asmr voice.

The worse thing is that it is portrayed as a necessary evil.
 
Top