Controversial General Political Discussion

Zenos7

Zenos7

‎
#25,641
#25,641
Logiko said:
Woke as you call them are in fact only following scientist (each and every single I follow in the militant community are linked to scientist beliefs or scientist people). Meaning that when a rightist tries to call for the help of scientist they are actually dumbfonded by their replies that is aligning with the "woke". Scientist are the source of our knowledge. Biology, archeology, sociology, anthropology, those are the things we base our knowledge on (patriarchy/feminism/Gender studies etc).

Those are facts mate. There are no logical reason for your reaction.
Click to expand...
yeah like that study with biologists where it turned out that like 96% of them think life starts at conception. oh wait thats not the mainstream leftist position at all
Post automatically merged:

Score said:
I see it more as passion, but I get your point bro. Hijab in particular employs an aggressive style and, while I am a fan of it, I can see why it might not be others' cup of tea.
Click to expand...
both are also pretty retarded on top of their aggressive style. and especially hijab mainly does sophistry. not as bad as haqiqatjou but still. that guy at least isnt as disingenuous as the two other specialists.
Post automatically merged:

Logiko said:
"God" is actually committing a war crime here:
Click to expand...
"God" can do anything he wants
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#25,645
#25,645
Monkey D Theories said:
that’s a dumb take
Click to expand...
No. I treat the concept of god like a normal person and I don't know why it should be different. A personn however the power and omnipotence doesn't have the right to forfeit someone elses life and in that case, its a war crime. A real one as "god" is seen as the slayer against an oppressive people.

Its exactly what hamas did. But softly and with an asmr voice.

The worse thing is that it is portrayed as a necessary evil.
 
Fn Lucci

Fn Lucci

‎
#25,652
#25,652
Roo said:
Yeah, its not like every human society conquers and wages wars. Specially one where the main religion is about a conqueror :milaugh:
Click to expand...
Well, not "about." But as someone who didn't grow up with any sort of religion it does blow me away how much people give a fuck about what set someone reps. You can completely remove religion from any of these situations and nothing actually changes, but someone will pick the chip up and put it back in
 
Roo

Roo

‎
#25,653
#25,653
Fn Lucci said:
Well, not "about." But as someone who didn't grow up with any sort of religion it does blow me away how much people give a fuck about what set someone reps. You can completely remove religion from any of these situations and nothing actually changes, but someone will pick the chip up and put it back in
Click to expand...
What someone reps is important when pointing out cognitive dissonance. You can’t go around shitting on the west for “colonialism” when your entire society is based on basically the same shit.
 
Monkey D Theories

Monkey D Theories

‎
#25,655
#25,655
Mr. Reloaded said:
Checking up on ya'll.

What's the current topic?
Click to expand...
I think we're talking about religion?
Post automatically merged:

Fn Lucci said:
Well, not "about." But as someone who didn't grow up with any sort of religion it does blow me away how much people give a fuck about what set someone reps. You can completely remove religion from any of these situations and nothing actually changes, but someone will pick the chip up and put it back in
Click to expand...
Yeah to me most religions are very similar.

Roo said:
What someone reps is important when pointing out cognitive dissonance. You can’t go around shitting on the west for “colonialism” when your entire society is based on basically the same shit.
Click to expand...
I think islamic conquests were fundamentally different from colonialism.

In that I don't believe islamic conquerors ever displaced the native population, as in the case of America or Israel, or subjugated the native population in order to funnel wealth back to the mother country, like with India or Africa
 
Toby D. Dog

Toby D. Dog

‎
#25,658
#25,658
Monkey D Theories said:
I think we're talking about religion?
Post automatically merged:



Yeah to me most religions are very similar.


I think islamic conquests were fundamentally different from colonialism.

In that I don't believe islamic conquerors ever displaced the native population, as in the case of America or Israel, or subjugated the native population in order to funnel wealth back to the mother country, like with India or Africa
Click to expand...
Thing is that we can go back hundreds or thousands of years and we'll see empires from all corners of the world displacing entire swaths of people from their homelands. But the further we go back the more difficult it is to get a clear picture of what went down. Muslims conquered most of the Iberian peninsula 1300 years ago. Although I'm not sure if they displaced the local population or not.
 
Monkey D Theories

Monkey D Theories

‎
#25,659
#25,659
Toby D. Dog said:
Thing is that we can go back hundreds or thousands of years and we'll see empires from all corners of the world displacing entire swaths of people from their homelands. But the further we go back the more difficult it is to get a clear picture of what went down. Muslims conquered most of the Iberian peninsula 1300 years ago. Although I'm not sure if they displaced the local population or not.
Click to expand...
Don't know much about Iberian history, but from my understanding, it was the spanish that did the displacing.

They expelled all of the jews and muslims from the land. That's why there were so many jews in North Africa. All the ones that got expelled from Spain went there.

However eventually there was a rise in antisemitism due to the Arab Israeli conflict and jews in muslim countries got kicked out in the mid 20th century. That's why Israel is like 50% mizrahi, despite the original zionists being ashkenazi jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top