Powers & Abilities The actual ultimate thread on swordsmanship - Part 1

#23
Sanji as a kid trained in some swordsmanship, part of Germa training.

Does this enough to classify him as a swordsman?
That's something i ask back to you!. For me him isn't
Post automatically merged:

King says he’s not a swordsman because he doesn’t use sword styles and techniques

well Big mom definitely uses Sword styles and techniques… Elbaf spear is a sword technique… So Big mom is a swordsman according to King’s definition of swordsman
Prove to me she is a Swordsman.

Even in that Only Swordsman painel from SBS.
Post automatically merged:

Why was Zoro only called a Master Swordsman after starting to use CoC?

When Zoro uses Haki on his Sword, its swordsmanship but when Shanks does that, its external power? You arent even hiding your double standards 🤣
Where is Said that Shanks is a master Swordsman?
 
#26
If Shanks is not a swordsman, Zoro is not a swordsman as well

:kuzanshut:



But then... if Zoro is not a swordsman, why does he dreams to become the strongest of them?
If Shanks is not a swordsman, why does Oda use him of alll people as a term of comparison to explain why Mihawk is the World's Strongest Swordsman?

Would it make any sense for Oda to say that Zoro has better abilities than, say, Kid or Sabo, and thus is the World's Strongest Swordsman? Obviously no
So
It's really easy to understand that in Oda's mind Shanks is a swordsman






And in fact...

 
#29
When did Mihawk ever use a Named Attack or showcased his Sword-Style?
I mean he is more often shown using cutting feats like Kraig's ship or the ice in Marineford. Hakimen like Shanks usually have a different kind of feats.
When Shanks met Whitebeard he couldn’t care less about his Haki and started talking about his duels with Mihawk.

The Marines view Shanks as an inferior Swordsman to Mihawk and never hyped his Haki.

Shanks was holding Gryphon when aiming his Haki at Greenbull and the anime expanded on it.

Shanks cut Kidd’s railgun clean in half with a flying slash.

Both Oden and Zoro were hyped for their Haki more than their swordsmanship in Wano.

All of Roger’s combat scenes involve swordsmanship.

This hype for Haki over swordsmanship to separate Roger/Shanks from Zoro/Mihawk never made sense.
Anime is still non-canon, not sure why everyone is acting like it matters lately. Whitebeard talked abiut their sword duels but the feat shown there was still haki. I'm not saying they're not amazing swordsmen, just their main strenght lies elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
#30
Ok, i take the L here, yet i didn't Said that Shanks isn't Swordsman.


Is said and showed to us is Shanks Monstrous Haki and Only one time was Said about Shanks Swordsmanship.

So in mangas panela, Swordsmanships=Mihawk>Shanks.
Haki=Shanks>Mihawk, that's why They Said They're equals or rival, is like WB and Roger, one is the strongest Man in the world and the other is PK.

Yet who are stronger? Aren't They are Rival?
 
#32
Ok, i take the L here, yet i didn't Said that Shanks isn't Swordsman.


Is said and showed to us is Shanks Monstrous Haki and Only one time was Said about Shanks Swordsmanship.

So in mangas panela, Swordsmanships=Mihawk>Shanks.
Haki=Shanks>Mihawk, that's why They Said They're equals or rival, is like WB and Roger, one is the strongest Man in the world and the other is PK.

Yet who are stronger? Aren't They are Rival?
The manga states Mihawk is the WSS. Since Shanks is a swordsman that means Mihawk > Shanks. Why do you and some fans continue to overlook that part?


The manga has never stated Shanks haki is stronger. The manga hasn't said anything about the strength of Mihawk's haki.
 
Last edited:
#33
The manga states Mihawk is the WSS. Since Shanks is a swordsman that means Mihawk > Shanks. Why do you and some fans continue to overlook that part?


The manga has never stated Shanks haki is stronger. The manga has said anything about Mihawk's haki.
All Swordsmen are Hakimen (Roger, Oden, Mihawk)
Not all Hakimen are Swordsmen (Garp).

Regardless Hakimen (including swordsmen) are the strongest characters in verse (Shanks neggs admiral fodder).
 
#35
Big mom is not a Swordsman, Kizaru neither, Even King. Well they Still attacks with swords.
u dont need to be a swordsman to use swordsmanship lmao


I am not saying, Law or Fuji aren't Swordsman They are, but is simples They are knows about They extern type of Power,
oda has never differentiated df and normal swordsmen
its all agendas

Existe guys who live as a pure Swordsmans ways= Mihawk,Zoro,Samurais,Ryuuma and Vista....
literally all these " pure swordsman " use haki lmao


And we have guys who don't Even when They are Swordsmans= Fuji,Law,Shanks....
fuji : gravity blade
law :

shanks : roger literally saw his talent through his sword skills


and then later made shanks inherit his own sword style

shanks even had multiple duels with mihawk

he even went as far as using his sword while doing a simple haki blast

he is also very graceful with his sword

a sword without grace isnt a strong sword as mihawk said

shanks uses his sword for literally everything


he is also VERY honourable just like zoro


if this isnt oda showing him being a swordsman then idk what is
tho this thread is only abt swordsmanship , its not abt who we consider a swordsman or who we dont

I don't see @Rootbeer in your tags lol.
i simply copied nik's tag list
and i also have no interest in adding a brain rot like him

We never see hakimen display the kind of feats Mihawk does.
mihawk has barely even shown anything lol
and even in simple terms , we have seen both the parties display strong sword slashes , which is a sword skill

The latter is more hyped because of his sword skill, while people like Shanks or Roger because of their haki.
a strong swordsman is hyped up by his sword skills and haki
and shanks's swordsmanship is pretty renowned in the onepiece verse considering the world government used his sword skills to hype up mihawk

its saying his swordsmanship is only second to mihawk's
and with haki , we have a lot of examples of zoro's haki being hyped

like i said , swordsmanship and haki go toe to toe with each other
You can make a case for some DFs not falling under the swordsmanship domain, like Law's DF, which, even though he uses it in accordance with his sword, uses a mechanism completely foreign to what swordsmanship is
anything done through a sword is swordsmanship as i have alrdy said above
law uses his spatial hax through his sword


but its still swordsmanship

similar to law's knife - room

Now is Shanks' Divine Departure swordsmanship or could he use it with a metal pipe too? Theoretically he could use it with a pipe too,
1. headcanon
2. shanks can use a metal pipe for all i care , but the fact is that he did it with his sword thus its swordsmanship

kaku can throw air slashes through his kicks , but when he does the same with his sword
its still called swordsmanship

its not like just cause he can do the same without swords , it cant be considered swordsmanship
 
#36
The manga states Mihawk is the WSS. Since Shanks is a swordsman that means Mihawk > Shanks. Why do you and some fans continue to overlook that part?


The manga has never stated Shanks haki is stronger. The manga hasn't said anything about the strength of Mihawk's haki.
About Primebeard and Roger who is stronger, for you?
Post automatically merged:

u dont need to be a swordsman to use swordsmanship lmao



oda has never differentiated df and normal swordsmen
its all agendas



literally all these " pure swordsman " use haki lmao



fuji : gravity blade
law :

shanks : roger literally saw his talent through his sword skills


and then later made shanks inherit his own sword style

shanks even had multiple duels with mihawk

he even went as far as using his sword while doing a simple haki blast

he is also very graceful with his sword

a sword without grace isnt a strong sword as mihawk said

shanks uses his sword for literally everything


he is also VERY honourable just like zoro


if this isnt oda showing him being a swordsman then idk what is
tho this thread is only abt swordsmanship , its not abt who we consider a swordsman or who we dont


i simply copied nik's tag list
and i also have no interest in adding a brain rot like him


mihawk has barely even shown anything lol
and even in simple terms , we have seen both the parties display strong sword slashes , which is a sword skill


a strong swordsman is hyped up by his sword skills and haki
and shanks's swordsmanship is pretty renowned in the onepiece verse considering the world government used his sword skills to hype up mihawk

its saying his swordsmanship is only second to mihawk's
and with haki , we have a lot of examples of zoro's haki being hyped

like i said , swordsmanship and haki go toe to toe with each other

anything done through a sword is swordsmanship as i have alrdy said above
law uses his spatial hax through his sword


but its still swordsmanship


similar to law's knife - room


1. headcanon
2. shanks can use a metal pipe for all i care , but the fact is that he did it with his sword thus its swordsmanship

kaku can throw air slashes through his kicks , but when he does the same with his sword
its still called swordsmanship

its not like just cause he can do the same without swords , it cant be considered swordsmanship
Now shows the painel of Shanks Nicknames and Even his Haki panela and Even his attacks panela, Why didn't him CUT Kidd in Haki?
 
#37
About Primebeard and Roger who is stronger, for you?
Post automatically merged:


Now shows the painel of Shanks Nicknames and Even his Haki panela and Even his attacks panela, Why didn't him CUT Kidd in Haki?


read the explanation from zoro master...there are swordsman that are able to NOT CUT ANYTHING these swordsman also have the ability to CUT THROUGH STEEL.

Now read what the old man taught luffy about ryou to which he also included how swordsmen use ryou


The intent of the swordsman matters. When choosing what to cut and what not to cut.


Now go look at shanks vs kidd what does shanks do???

1.Uses ryou and cuts through kidds steel weapon


2.Chooses to not cut/scar/cleave kidd in half no visible damage is shown to kidd
 
#38
Complaining about agenda driven posters.
Includes Big Mom.

Swordsmenship is performed by *drumroll* swordsmen.
Swordsmen are characters who use their swords (or another blade) exclusively, except for when they do not have it or using a sword is otherwise not possible.

Mihawk has good enough haki to block bullets with his arms. He used Yoru for it.
Shanks uses his sword everytime for attacks or blocks. He is a swordsman.
Law and Brook could use their Devil Fruits entirely without their sword. They mostly use their sword for it.
Some of Laws attacks can not be performed with a sword. Same goes for Brook. These occasions do not invalidate their swordsmen status.

King was heavily using a sword in the fight vs Zoro, yet he always switched between styles. He is not a swordsman (I mean duh, he even says so).
Admirals other than Fuji only occasionally summon/use a blade. They are not swordsmen.
Big Mom uses her DF without a sword most of the time. She is not a swordsman.
Whitebeard, Kaido, Apoo, XDrake... all of them posses and use weapons, but they are not tonfamen or axemen or kanabomen or swordsmen. The style needs to be the defining part of the character, otherwise they do not fit the bill.

Mihawk haters are hellbent on excluding everyone from the swordsmen group.
Mihawk swords swallowers are hellbent on including everyone into the swordsmen group.
Both groups suck ass and have no clue.
 
#39


read the explanation from zoro master...there are swordsman that are able to NOT CUT ANYTHING these swordsman also have the ability to CUT THROUGH STEEL.

Now read what the old man taught luffy about ryou to which he also included how swordsmen use ryou


The intent of the swordsman matters. When choosing what to cut and what not to cut.


Now go look at shanks vs kidd what does shanks do???

1.Uses ryou and cuts through kidds steel weapon


2.Chooses to not cut/scar/cleave kidd in half no visible damage is shown to kidd
Now shows to me the Haki feats from Shanks, and his Sword Feats.
Post automatically merged:

Complaining about agenda driven posters.
Includes Big Mom.

Swordsmenship is performed by *drumroll* swordsmen.
Swordsmen are characters who use their swords (or another blade) exclusively, except for when they do not have it or using a sword is otherwise not possible.

Mihawk has good enough haki to block bullets with his arms. He used Yoru for it.
Shanks uses his sword everytime for attacks or blocks. He is a swordsman.
Law and Brook could use their Devil Fruits entirely without their sword. They mostly use their sword for it.
Some of Laws attacks can not be performed with a sword. Same goes for Brook. These occasions do not invalidate their swordsmen status.

King was heavily using a sword in the fight vs Zoro, yet he always switched between styles. He is not a swordsman (I mean duh, he even says so).
Admirals other than Fuji only occasionally summon/use a blade. They are not swordsmen.
Big Mom uses her DF without a sword most of the time. She is not a swordsman.
Whitebeard, Kaido, Apoo, XDrake... all of them posses and use weapons, but they are not tonfamen or axemen or kanabomen or swordsmen. The style needs to be the defining part of the character, otherwise they do not fit the bill.

Mihawk haters are hellbent on excluding everyone from the swordsmen group.
Mihawk swords swallowers are hellbent on including everyone into the swordsmen group.
Both groups suck ass and have no clue.
That's true.


The Swordsmans are guys from that poster from VC, yet some of them has other DF or some extern Powers to utilize and not Goes to pure Swordsmans types.
 
Top