If you really wanna talk about politic and religion then yes. We can talk about the impact of religion on politic.

But here, you are simply quoting your sacred texts. This is not about politic. So please, be respectfull of those who want to talk about politic here and go do that in peace to the place create for it. :)
My newfound faith is deeply tied to my opinions on his takes. As such, it is important for me to quote it.

Just like you quote psuedoscience.
 
I’m pretty sure they do, some ants take in slaves from other colonies


???

a natural rock formation can form a box like figure. 4 sides and one opening for the light to come in
Well, the weird part is I'm saying that there's a design. That something like a rock formation doesn't follow rules beyond our comprehension. We understand erosion, sediment, tectonics, and gravity. Rock formations don't just appear spontaneously. They're not mysteries.

Also, pointing to a small planet as an ant colony and then mentioning that those ants find other ants, where we don't, is again why I don't think the analogy holds.
 
I mean... you literally posted a video of WatchMojo Nice Guys as some sort of evidence.
1. Its not watchmojo but a channel called "the take" a very well known channel in the feminist community runned by women analysing tropes in cinema and medias in generals. Similar to the Popculturedetective I sometimes quote here. So the opposite of a random channel like watchmojo.
2. I didn't used that as a science ressource but as a support to explain the problem with "nice guys" in popular culture and in societies in general.

Conclusion: You are lying + you are not watching the sources you are denouncing + You are not understanding what you are denouncing.
 
1. Its not watchmojo but a channel called "the take" a very well known channel in the feminist community runned by women analysing tropes in cinema and medias in generals. Similar to the Popculturedetective I sometimes quote here. So the opposite of a random channel like watchmojo.
2. I didn't used that as a science ressource but as a support to explain the problem with "nice guys" in popular culture and in societies in general.

Conclusion: You are lying + you are not watching the sources you are denouncing + You are not understanding what you are denouncing.
It has the same fucking voice as watchmojo. My apologies for not knowing the specific source, but you were definitely using it as proof of something. I watched the entire video because I remember Ross Gellar from my childhood, lmao.
 
Its you stop confusing women sir.


No lol. This was just a support. Here was my original post:
"Toxic Masculine Tropes in Media" is a form of proof, since you're using it as a way to show socialization.

I shall return to my previous quote: "If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all." - Romans 12:18

Goodbye.
 
Yes. Ants cannot conceptualize us, but they can understand that we're not the terrain and we're not food. They understand living beings and the threat we possess by pheromones.

So, saying that humans are ants gets into a weird and largely weak territory of downplay. The fact that we have the brains to even create such questions in itself is extraordinary.
Eh, his point was about our insignificance in the galaxy, not that we are literally ants
 
and used that video as some sort of proof.

It's just proof that Hollywood is as cringe as it's always been.
Oh ok. No. I didn't use that as a proof, I used that as a support to understand the problem. If you want proof, I'm sure there is enough sociological work about the subject in modern days.

But the "nice guy" is not just a simple hollywood trope, its also a toxic masculine behavior that a lot of men arbor.
 
If it's impossible, then there is no "when" lol. Devil fruits are impossible, so I can't talk about when someone eats one, y'know? I don't say what any number of people believe but you can be certain that some people believe there is positively no god
What i initially responded to was a view about human superiority. That has nothing to do with atheism
Post automatically merged:

I’m pretty sure they do, some ants take in slaves from other colonies
Or take over other colonies by taking their scent.

Yup
Post automatically merged:

is like a deterrent; like USA nuked Japan or how countries have nuclear weapons.
And I despise that just as much
Post automatically merged:

We understand erosion, sediment, tectonics, and gravity. Rock formations don't just appear spontaneously. They're not mysteries
Gravity is kinda a mystery


Also, pointing to a small planet as an ant colony and then mentioning that those ants find other ants, where we don't, is again why I don't think the analogy holds.
Your point before was about searching other ants, so this seems like moving the goalpost
 
Last edited:
Eh, his point was about our insignificance in the galaxy, not that we are literally ants
Your point before was about searching other ants, so this seems like moving the goalpost
Right. His point was not literally about ants, so it's not really moving the goalposts to say how we're not like ants, unless the point was to say we are. My point was that the analogy doesn't give us enough credit as living beings. The size of the galaxy doesn't change what we are but sure, Earth is tiny.

Gravity is kinda a mystery
There are things we don't know but that doesn't favor an argument on random/spontaneous design. So far nothing we know just *happens* so to say that everything just happened is a little weird.
 
Right. His point was not literally about ants, so it's not really moving the goalposts to say how we're not like ants, unless the point was to say we are. My point was that the analogy doesn't give us enough credit as living beings. The size of the galaxy doesn't change what we are but sure, Earth is tiny.


There are things we don't know but that doesn't favor an argument on random/spontaneous design. So far nothing we know just *happens* so to say that everything just happened is a little weird.
I'm not a scientist but the theories about the beginning of the universe. Some of them if I'm not mistaken explain that we are simply the result of an accidental process. We are simply lucky to exist because the way the universe is formed (the constants) would simply be the best way for life to appear.

But this has nothing to do with politic, I'll create a thread about science too.
 
I'm not a scientist but the theories about the beginning of the universe. Some of them if I'm not mistaken explain that we are simply the result of an accidental process. We are simply lucky to exist because the way the universe is formed (the constants) would simply be the best way for life to appear.

But this has nothing to do with politic, I'll create a thread about science too.
I don't think I've seen an irrefutable statistic but then I don't think the most modest calculation I've seen has an equivalent. "Lucky" seems pretty inadequate in that case even if I completely understand why no one would buy a religious explanation.
 
Top