and you seek to give the opressed classes rights to help them from the systematic opression of ig random forums or whatever
and when you do this how do you decide which group is more worthy of support
Dude, do you understand how massive the construction site would be ?
First, the entire rightist spectrum (beginning with liberals to straight up fascist will panic). Today, the overton windows has gone so far right that they see simple leftist like me like anarchist (not saying that being an anarchist is a bad things but that would not be my first goal) Plus, with the level of far right radicalism that is rising in society (bombing/attacks from the far right are in a all time high), what I would do first is put myself under tight security. Staying in the office as an leftist in a ultra liberal and patriarcal society where far right ideas are the norm is a life risking situation. I don't want to die, so there is that.
Second there is a massive work of planification. There is multiple things to attack from multiple front:
- Ultraliberalism
- Systemic racism
- Patriarchy
- Poor education system
- Desinformation.
So first, I would create or recreate a chart about the importance of science education but most of all, the importance of accepting in society social sciences as part of science (because even those in power don't believe it is a science)
Second, I would basically apply the core principles of what the LFI group in france wants to applies, a huge reform of the democracy (representation in the parliement, revocation of elected personal if the people deems it necessary etc.)
Third I would create a parliement but destined to science. It would be a chamber constituated by scientist and renawned scientific professionnal AND mix from ALL science discipline that would have for goal to read and officially approve law or ad addumdum on them before the law is voted.
This would create an visibility for science and the scientific knowledge on politic. This would also help people learn more about science and like I'm trying to do here, maybe deradicalize them on sensitive topic or at the contrary radicalize them for good reasons.
Then I would instantly create a universal wage for ALL by cutting military and security support, tax massively the super profits (/not allowing a certain degree of wealth beyond a certain outrageous point, and responsibilizing those people for them not to go away). This will lead to a nation where people are literally FREE from worries about ressources to simply live. TO that I would add MASSIVE bonuses to a series of necessary workfield.. (which would be also helped by a program of automatization of the "labor" workfields. This will highly benefit the economy as long as we do things correctly and smoothly.
Following that I would attack the problems one by one beginning with Ultra liberalism/ultranationalism/ultrasecuritarism (because when we are less poor and less stressed, we have less weight on our shoulder and we are therefore free to make other descisions).
THen it would be the case of patriarchy with a serie of counter mesure to the problems that are facing women but also for a better representation of men that are victims. I'mnot the best placed to talk about those mesureso I would absolutely refer to a council of some sort on the matter
THen you can attack different other aera (antiracism/anticolonialism etc..) or maybe do that at the same time. The goal is to target all the systemic issues, create counter offensive and make the life of everyone better..
ANd what will happen is that society will eventually (if the job is done well enough) deradicalize itself simply because there is no reason to be angry when you don't have ressource problems, where everyone - even prisonners - are treated like human beings and where everyone is not obligated to denounce everyone on twitter because the police doesn't help.. its might live us in Europe with white supremacist, but they will be oxtracized eventually.
I'm not saying it's easy and that it will take a year or two, it might take decades, but leftism will lead to a more peacefull society. After those problems are resolved, we can trydifferent type of society. We might wanna try even anarchism in time. But this is for centuries ahead.
Leftism is not a danger its the best solution we know yet. Other systems have failed.
But I don't want that kind of power, others are better suited. I'm only a messenger. I want you guys to understand those values.
Bob and C4N are the pinnacle of mental illness in this forum.
Let's pipe down the psychophobia, ok ?
not a literal yt rant
but just the structure of it
at least of the one ive seen
i forget the exact passages but the one, ive quoted when responding to you that one
it specifically just claimed x thing without any claims backing it
it's wrote like a rant, that's kinda the point
one you failed to see ig
BEcause it was most likely a conclusion, the actual reasonning is else where in the article. And sometimes when someone says something they are often referring to past researches, those are at the ends.
This is specific to the Ncbi, not all paper are written the same way. Especially when there is a consensus between researcher.
how was trump even akin to biden
Collusion with the far right when it fits their agenda.
the democrats depised trump
And Macron despise Le pen, still they are about to install their far right principles into the law.
it's not as a result of them being fake but them having a job unlike you who seemingly has unlimited free time to state your positions as much and as often as you want
I will grant the fact that Biden is a liberal that is leaning very slightly to the left. He is still a liberal that doesn't understand the core principle of the problem of patriarchy
i would imagine being a president involves more then just public speaking events but ig that's all you think rulers of a country do
THis is not an excuse. Macron went in front of the camera to defend a rapist. And Biden has time to clearly stated his affection for the Isralian gov.
when you mean liberal are you talking about even the same group of people as me??
Liberal is an words that means something in terms of economy and social values. Liberalism is the apologism of notion like freedom and individualism, liberalism is the notion that we have control over our entire path and our future. Those are values that enters in conflict with the leftist values that are against individualism on a core basis and that think that we are the produce of our experiences, environment and genes and that we therefore can't be in control of everything.
That's why liberals have such problematic and self centered/individualistic responses to the problematics of the world. IN a way, leftism is the antithesis of liberalism. And the conservative right/far right are just liberalism + bigotry/sexism they are just an extention of liberalism.
That's why you need to stop calling me a liberal and listening to the far right that say that every progressive person are liberals, because that's just not who I am. I'm the opposite. The left (at least the left of today) is the natural ennemy of liberalism.
how does worstgen prove shit
it's just some forum, it's not exactly mainstream
THis doesn't prove anything. This is just a representation. A way to understand how society work through the lens of a smaller society. Its not scientific, its just an observation.
and biden supporting helping isarel could just boil down to america as a organzation having pre existing deals with that country
Or like.. we don't support gov that do genocide ?
it's like how trump inherited the poor policy that odama had on mexican migrants
There is no such thing as a poor policy on migrants. Migrants is a bigot problems, migrants don't creates economic or social problems on a systemic scale therefore there is absolutely NO reason to talk about migrant unless we are bigot and we don't like people of other color/culture.
Again, this boils done to profit. If its true that they are leaning more and more to the left, their only goal is profit mate.
very much leftist talking points
Or just good point to appeal to a younger and therefore more progressive audience.
your kinda just assuming im racist for no good reason
Well, you are kind of proving me that you have all the trait of the far right bro..
Show me me more tolerance and I might consider that I'm wrong here.
The point is that the trial was used as an excuse to delegitimize the #MeToo movement and the words of multiple women.
In fact it was decumented in french here, showing the role the far right and incel/virilist group had as effect over the situation. Spoiler : they literally controlled the entire agenda.
(put translation in english on) (this is a summary of the documentary, it seems that the docu is not available anymore)
that because random idiots online made fun of her that therefore the status quo in power is right wing
Again, this was not a random bunch of idiots on a forum, it was a targeted marketing strategy lead by masculinist to push the agenda against women and therefore make fun of AMber heard. This leads to an overproliferation of pro deep/anti heard content on EVERY social media platerform available.
took me a literal second to find a vid of some person defending her
How many of those video against video making fun of amber heard mate ? Tell me
Or are you starting to understand that there is indeed a bigger problem here ?
The unborn isn’t hijacking a woman’s body.
It is. A woman that doesn't want a baby is literally forced to give her body's ressources to a lifeform that she doesn't want to help. Like explained in the allegory, its not about wether the baby or the violonist is aware or not, its about the right of the body owner not to accept someone pumping up their lifeforce without their consent, EVEN if it means the death of said organism.
Its about the foundamental right of the one that is actually living and not the ones that is in a state of non life.
