General & Others Why has One Piece failed so miserably in the West?

One Piece is the best ever but for some reason my family members aren’t into it despite being anime watchers. They all like Naruto and those ordinary shonen.

I try to tell them to be patient, it will get better after 200 episodes (story starts in Water 7/Enies Lobby arc) but they scoffed lol.
 
I'll give you a rewrite of Marineford without Whitebeard.
Ace is still in charge of the Spade pirates. Blackbeard captures Ace just like before because he's the real pirate hunter and this is still consistent with his current actions like capturing Bonny. Luffy goes to Impel Down to save Ace and then escapes with Croc and Ivankov and arrives at Marineford. But without the Whitebeard Pirates, Luffy and his new pirate crew fights all battles to save Ace and get to the platform. So essentially the entire arc is the same without Whitebeard. The only thing he does is 1) praise luffy as the chosen one, 2) give Blackbeard a power-up and 3) give us a sob story so we can feel bad when he dies but at the cost of denying luffy and his new crew fights. He is a net negative and he is an example of Wano-syndrome before Wano.

Himeno was fine because there was some character development with Denji, not be so desperate to get sex, and her death set the tone that in this story anyone can die and that has been consistent throughout the story.

Reze was a acceptable arc twist. oh this normal girl is actually the enamy. I think Reze was supposed to teach Denji about choosing his friends wisely and not simping but I'm not sure if that character development happened.

Makima was also supposed to be character development for Denji,be independent, but it doesn't seem like that has occurred so that's a let down.


But all 3 characters actually interacted with Denji and there were plot points with them. Meanwhile Whitebeard just appears, has a pep talk with Luffy cuz chosen one, does some flashy attacks and dies. okay.... If you can't see that Whitebeard's writing was a tier or 2 below CSM, idk what to say.
There is no marineford without WB. The whole arc was a plot for the Marines to bring WB in the open, and no WB means no broadcast and nobody can actually save Ace.
Which also mean that Luffy dies in ID because the only person who actually allowed him to escape was BB breaking in and creating mayhem.
Ace would not have been executed like that, he would probably been executed in ID.
There is no Gura Gura for BB and probably no yonko title.
I don't understand how can you have such a bad understanding of a story for children.
 
There is no marineford without WB. The whole arc was a plot for the Marines to bring WB in the open, and no WB means no broadcast and nobody can actually save Ace.
I don't even remember this part. I thought the point of Marineford was to have Ace die

Which also mean that Luffy dies in ID because the only person who actually allowed him to escape was BB breaking in and creating mayhem.
Ace would not have been executed like that, he would probably been executed in ID.
There is no Gura Gura for BB and probably no yonko title.
I don't understand how can you have such a bad understanding of a story for children.
Shanks could easily save Luffy.
 
I don't even remember this part. I thought the point of Marineford was to have Ace die
The point of Marineford was to bring out WB.
If they wanted to just kill Ace they would have shot him in the head the moment BB handed him in, don't you think?
And without WB and the fleet, Luffy arrives and the admirals wipe everybody.

Shanks could easily save Luffy.
Yeah we saw how well that turned out for WB.
BB could approach impel down just because he was a scichibukai, the yonkos are continuously monitored and the moment shank approached he'd have found there all the Marine force
 
Well, Naruto ended a decade ago so there is a vacuum left behind that One Piece is currently filling, it's gaining traction now.

Even so, I'd say Dragon Ball Super had a higher peak in the west than anything One Piece has done recently. Even "Gear 5" that was supposed to be so iconic and break the internet pales in comparsion to the cultural impact left behind by Ultra Instinct.

People tried to make viewing parties for Gear 5 but it could never measure up to the crowds of 10,000+ that were present in multiple locations watching the final 2 Dragon Ball Super episodes, and all streaming sites crashing of course.





I make these comparisons because one piece fans themselves were proping up gear 5's popularity in comparison to Super Saiyan.
 
Dragon Ball Super may be a perfect example of Popular /= Good.
It's probably the worst Dragon Ball product that ever came out.
But again, everyone in Latin America and certain Europe country (Italy, France, Germany) grew up with Dragonball. When Dragonball was the ONLY anime.
When One Piece came out the gate was open, and in Europe for example, at least where I grew up, Naruto and One Piece were at the same level of popularity.
Nowadays One Piece is relevant mostly because it still exists.
 
This sentence makes zero sense lmao
It's very simple, maybe I should have phrased it better.
Naruto and One Piece, in Europe, were famous because they were the only relevant ones.
When Naruto finished, even shit like Toriko became relevant to fill the gap.
One Piece remained very famous because he was the heir of Dragonball, and never left the place.
 
C

CensoredbyWG

Whitebeard does nothing meaningful before Marineford. He meats with Shanks. Wow. 10/10. /s
Sure Oda wrote him into the story but he had no effect on anything until Marineford then was given a sob story so we cared about him and then killed off. Introducing a character so they can be killed off is mid tier writing.
Zorotard argument, shanks and WB meeting and parting the skies together is a HUGE event.
 
Character wise Kishimoto claps.

Shikamaru
Gaara
Have better characterization than most Straw Hats.
Gaara really had a lot of development after his battle with Naruto, but there are many One Piece characters with similar development (e.g.: Buggy, Crocodile, Lucci), and some have even more fantastic journeys and buildups (Buggy's leap from East Blue "king" to Yonko, leading stronger pirates to the One Piece and "teaching" how to be a true pirate, was one of the best things that happened recently). Then, after his rescue arc, he was just brushed off, although he had a better run than most other characters.

Shikamaru is a well built character, I agree, but even him suffers from Naruto inconsistencies. For example, early in the chunins exams his plan to defeat Temari was basically the same that Naruto had to defeat Neji, yet only Shikamaru got promoted to chunin (btw, Naruto's early battles were full of great, overloooked, strategy). His initial plan against Kakuzu and Hidan was ridiculous, if Kakashi (and later Naruto) weren't there, Team 10 would be easily dead. His relationships with other characters and personality buildup (from lazy bum to an actual resposible leader) was great, but his intelligence is somewhat overrated.

Depends on whether you define world-building as quantity or quality. OP wins on quantity but quality is similar. I could nitpick all sorts of issues but instead I'll focus on my top 2 or 3.

1. Revolutionary Army is completely incompatible with JoyJoy. The idea underneath a revolution is that the history is UNWRITTEN and that your actions matter! There is no savior and if you want society to change then you must put in the work to change the minds of people around you and lead a rebellion that otherthrows the ruling class. In contrast the idea behind a chosen one and destiny (will of d, inherent will) is that the future IS written and your actions are futile if you're not the chosen one (e.g. Gol D. Roger). I think these two concepts are completely incompatible and if Oda wanted a story about a revolution then Sabo should have been the MC.

2. The world feels like a theme park or like Kingdom Hearts rather than a real world. a) Each island has a gimmick (eg. alice in wonderland WCI) but they feel isolated and don't feel like they're interconnected with each other. Events happen at 1 Island and the rest of the world is unchanged, similar to KH. b) Additionally, there is no consistently: magic is in the form of devil fruits and haki (ki, chakra) and then there is also advanced science. The characters include: gaints, gaint snail ships, moon people, gods, fishfolk, aristocracy, etc.

I could go on and point out other issues like retcons, e.g. Shanks and Buggy should already know the secret of One Piece or Shanks should have had haki to protect his arm but I think these issues are obvious.

As for comparing Doffy with Pain, I did that because both arcs are past the halfway point of each story. Pain wanted to save the world by causing everyone to feel pain. I disagree with his ideology but it was memorable. Meanwhile Doffy was reduced to an incompetant spoiled child. Both fights had dues ex power ups (sage mode, gear 4) and both were only useful for 1 fight before being replaced (jinchuriki/sage of six paths, future sight haki) and both had the gimmick of destroying the entire town/island. But the pain fight was more interesting because he had different bodies and doffy had a birdcage so even on the decline Naruto was at least as good or maybe even better than One Piece.
1. The "chosen one" trope is really a problem, specially recently, I agree, but I don't see incompatibilities between the revos and JoyBoy, I didn't really understand this part of your criticism. The real world revolutions never were simply "overthrowing the ruling class"... it was ALWAYS a new power rising (e.g.: Bourgeoisie vs. a weakened Absolutism in French Revolution, a new ruling class emerges). However, I see Luffy as an anarchist, while the revos seem to be more on the socialist side, so they may have some things in common (specially the enemies), but in the end they may not blend together. I don't think many things will change in EoS, Luffy (plus the revos probably) will just overthrow the current World Government (but there will still be kings, nobility, etc., maybe even the WG will continue to exist).

2. One Piece is an epic fantasy, so I really don't mind countries with themes or being heavily stereotyped. They have life on their own and their particular characteristics/issues. Naruto, on the other hand, looked totally generic outside of Konoha, everything looked centered around the Land of Fire. Well, One Piece is centered around the strawhats, but the events in each country DO have consequences for the world (e.g.: the Arabasta and Dressrosa incidents prompted the dissolution of the Shichibukai). About the "magic" and races "incosistency", I didn't really understand your concern. Different races has been appearing since East Blue and haki was appeared on the very first chapter... everyone who paid attention had it coming.

Shanks' lack of CoA in chapter #1 is really a inconsistency, I agree, but both him and Buggy were never hinted to be knowledgeable about the One Piece. We could assume that since they were Roger Pirates, but we knew since at least Arabasta (chapter #218) about the Rio Poneglyph and, so far, we knew that Shanks had no means of reading the poneglyphs. He could've a Laugh Tale's eternal pose, like in Stampede, but that wouldn't make sense considering Roger's last words (he would instruct only Shanks if he wanted him to be his successor).

Fair enough, although Pain's ideals were brought down by "talk no jutsu" in the end. Doffy wasn't incompetent, he just couldn't hold a candle to Luffy and was defeated. Gear 4th was useful against Cracker and Katakuri (in other words, by all of WCI) and for a part of Wano too. Pain's fight was indeed better, Dressrosa's final chapters were too dragged out and the birdcage was bs... but the ending was MUCH more satisfying, IMO. The arc comparison is sound though, they really encompass the same stage for each story, now I understand your point. I guess we just have a difference of opinion really.
 
Zorotard argument, shanks and WB meeting and parting the skies together is a HUGE event.
Shanks could part the skies by himself. WB is a filler character and he dilutes the story.

Gaara really had a lot of development after his battle with Naruto, but there are many One Piece characters with similar development (e.g.: Buggy, Crocodile, Lucci), and some have even more fantastic journeys and buildups (Buggy's leap from East Blue "king" to Yonko, leading stronger pirates to the One Piece and "teaching" how to be a true pirate, was one of the best things that happened recently). Then, after his rescue arc, he was just brushed off, although he had a better run than most other characters.

Shikamaru is a well built character, I agree, but even him suffers from Naruto inconsistencies. For example, early in the chunins exams his plan to defeat Temari was basically the same that Naruto had to defeat Neji, yet only Shikamaru got promoted to chunin (btw, Naruto's early battles were full of great, overloooked, strategy). His initial plan against Kakuzu and Hidan was ridiculous, if Kakashi (and later Naruto) weren't there, Team 10 would be easily dead. His relationships with other characters and personality buildup (from lazy bum to an actual resposible leader) was great, but his intelligence is somewhat overrated.
The Hokage goal should have been dropped at the Cunnin exam. It was fine at the start of the story but once people are dying, Naruto's goal of becoming Hokage becomes too selfish. Shikamaru was the only character that demonstrated mental strategy so I was okay with only him being promoted.



1. The "chosen one" trope is really a problem, specially recently, I agree, but I don't see incompatibilities between the revos and JoyBoy, I didn't really understand this part of your criticism. The real world revolutions never were simply "overthrowing the ruling class"... it was ALWAYS a new power rising (e.g.: Bourgeoisie vs. a weakened Absolutism in French Revolution, a new ruling class emerges). However, I see Luffy as an anarchist, while the revos seem to be more on the socialist side, so they may have some things in common (specially the enemies), but in the end they may not blend together. I don't think many things will change in EoS, Luffy (plus the revos probably) will just overthrow the current World Government (but there will still be kings, nobility, etc., maybe even the WG will continue to exist).
They don't blend together. Revolutionizes want to change the beliefs of the population. Meanwhile Luffy is more of an anarchist or even authoritarian since his justification for all his actions is his fists.

2. One Piece is an epic fantasy, so I really don't mind countries with themes or being heavily stereotyped. They have life on their own and their particular characteristics/issues. Naruto, on the other hand, looked totally generic outside of Konoha, everything looked centered around the Land of Fire. Well, One Piece is centered around the strawhats, but the events in each country DO have consequences for the world (e.g.: the Arabasta and Dressrosa incidents prompted the dissolution of the Shichibukai). About the "magic" and races "incosistency", I didn't really understand your concern. Different races has been appearing since East Blue and haki was appeared on the very first chapter... everyone who paid attention had it coming.
I'm fine with Sterotypes (norms) like in G Gundam but the OP world doesn't feel realistic. it feels completely fake. Like I don't see how living under Blackbeard or Donflamanigo is bad enough that it would justify people giving up their lifespawn to Big Meme as protection money. Alternatively, the Navy/Marines/World Govt./Admirals/Gorosoi/Holy Knights/Imu? can destroy any Island but they allow all these Islands to be ruled by warloads and yonkos. The worldbuilding makes 0 sense, even worse than Naruto.

2Shanks' lack of CoA in chapter #1 is really a inconsistency, I agree, but both him and Buggy were never hinted to be knowledgeable about the One Piece. We could assume that since they were Roger Pirates, but we knew since at least Arabasta (chapter #218) about the Rio Poneglyph and, so far, we knew that Shanks had no means of reading the poneglyphs. He could've a Laugh Tale's eternal pose, like in Stampede, but that wouldn't make sense considering Roger's last words (he would instruct only Shanks if he wanted him to be his successor).
There are other problems. I'm rereading Little Garden and Luffy mocks the giants for caring about the will of Gods. Or the Baroque Works crew, including Mr.0, wanting to remain anonymous when it seems like taking over Islands is the norm in this world.
 
Nah u could say this 3 years or so ago but for now along with live action one piece is very popular, but yeah compare to jjk or demon slayer it took very slow to gain popularity nearly yook two decades for one piece to be this popular enough being compares with other big names
 
Last edited:
It's very simple, maybe I should have phrased it better.
Naruto and One Piece, in Europe, were famous because they were the only relevant ones.
When Naruto finished, even shit like Toriko became relevant to fill the gap.
One Piece remained very famous because he was the heir of Dragonball, and never left the place.
I mean One Piece has always been famous, not very much in the west but still VERY famous.
Claiming One Pieces is filling gaps when there is literally hundreds of shonens shipping every week is just I don't know dumb.

It is still trending every year with chapters, just like and even more than new trend shonens of today.
JJK hype has passed, Demon Slayer and more, OP still remains at the top.
Bleach at its end was barely talked or hyped, Naruto was mostly criticized during it's final 50-100 chapters.

So no, One Piece is not relevant because it is still being published but rather because it still delivers quality story and chapters.
 
I mean One Piece has always been famous, not very much in the west but still VERY famous.
Claiming One Pieces is filling gaps when there is literally hundreds of shonens shipping every week is just I don't know dumb.

It is still trending every year with chapters, just like and even more than new trend shonens of today.
JJK hype has passed, Demon Slayer and more, OP still remains at the top.
Bleach at its end was barely talked or hyped, Naruto was mostly criticized during it's final 50-100 chapters.

So no, One Piece is not relevant because it is still being published but rather because it still delivers quality story and chapters.
I believe I am coming across as negative towards One Piece.
One Piece is unique, the only gag-battle shonen manga currently on the market I believe.
An heritage of a different era. This is mostly what I mean. One Piece endures because he was good and the past allowed it to be great.
 
Top