[FNZ] Super Role Madness World Of Warcraft: Legion

[Flower]

I haven't seen where her vote is, but my strong read was directed to her initial position around Ekko - you said it was a defence, when, while it can be so, it's just as plausible that it's there to provide some nuance to what the actual argument against Ekko is.

I don't hate her vote off of her stated reasoning - she concedes that Ekko can be scum, then saw you tie her to him, in a way that she says makes her think you might know what Ekko would flip. It's not unreasonable then for her to see that, and suspect that you and Ekko are scum together. Further, Ekko has a wagon on him, so supporting that wagon isn't outrageous either, especially if Ekko is town, her basis for suspecting you falls apart too. It's not a bad line of logic, it's not that I necessarily subscribe to it all, but I can see and understand the thought process.

So what's your read on Gram, then? If you agree with the logic, should you not scum read him?

 

[Ratchet]

Flower if at any time of the day you still need a heal please tag everyone and ask again

I don't love this post though, feels like it could be a non-secuiter designed to get Fkower onside by dangling a heal. Why did you feel the need to state this Michelle?

 

[RippedCal]

The city of Dalaran has opened its gates, the first 16 players that quote it will be able to enter it.​

Ripped one will enter the world of dalaran

 

[Flower]

Well I explained why I wasn't scum reading him in that post. What contention do you have with that?

That you agreeing with the logic and not scum reading Gram doesn't make any sense.

 

[Ratchet]

So what's your read on Gram, then? If you agree with the logic, should you not scum read him?

Flower why did you ignore this part:
"it's not that I necessarily subscribe to it all"

You can't just keep selectively reading my posts to land some sort of gotcha.

 

[Ratchet]

That you agreeing with the logic and not scum reading Gram doesn't make any sense.

But it does, and I've already explained why in the first post I said on the matter. Let me go quote it once I've caught up.

 

[Flower]

Flower why did you ignore this part:
"it's not that I necessarily subscribe to it all"

You can't just keep selectively reading my posts to land some sort of gotcha.

Oh shit, I thought that would work. Damn.

 

[Michelle]

I don't love this post though, feels like it could be a non-secuiter designed to get Fkower onside by dangling a heal. Why did you feel the need to state this Michelle?

Because I think she is town and she deserves the heal

 

[Michelle]

I don't love this post though, feels like it could be a non-secuiter designed to get Fkower onside by dangling a heal. Why did you feel the need to state this Michelle?

Because I think she is town and she deserves the heal

 

[Ratchet]

I just don‘t think that he actually believes what he‘s posting there. Looks like you‘re strong Town to him, but he doesn‘t scum read Gram. What do you make of that?

Because town aren't infallible? Why do you expect me to just be certain on a read on Gram day 1?

 

[RippedCal]

Because I think she is town and she deserves the heal

Do u think Gramm is scum miss Michelle

 

[Flower]

Because town aren't infallible? Why do you expect me to just be certain on a read on Gram day 1?

Uhm, you've just been scum with him for starters.

 

[Grammaton]

i already stated earlier i town read ekko, i even tagged him for reaction, i voted for reaction and still kekko ignores me atm.

i have a meme vote on ekko, i am going back to pot later.

if michelle think ekko is scum that her opinion not mine.

i already see other people form on ekko beside me.

ok, fair enough we’ll leave it at that

 

[Ratchet]

He said my slot needs scrutiny if Ekko flips mafia. No read, no vote, no question, no push.
It was me the one pushing him.
Without my push there would not be any discussion.

Okay I see where you're coming from

Not sure it's entirely accurate - I think you can probably say his initiation regarding your connection with Ekko qualifies as a push, but I can see why you'd think otherwise.

 

[Grammaton]

Eh, don't love this. I feel like you're fence sitting on this interaction - I would imagine at the very least you'd want to check over what Gram is pushing Michelle for to see if the exasperation is earned first, no? Instead you just pass it off in a way that would serve to avoid conflict with Gram.

Probably not aligned with Gram I think, on this basis

don’t hate this point

 

[Michelle]

Do u think Gramm is scum miss Michelle

Yes, Sir Cal

 

[Ratchet]

Uhm, you've just been scum with him for starters.

@Grammaton What do you think of Flower's position that I should be able to easily read you because we were scum together last game?

 

[Flower]

Meh.


Unvote.


Ratchet not taking my bait kek.

 

[Ratchet]

Meh.


Unvote.


Ratchet not taking my bait kek.

What "bait"?

 

[Flower]

What "bait"?

I thought I could get a repeat of previous game and you to call me scum and then outing yourself, but guess not.