[FNZ] Super Role Madness World Of Warcraft: Legion

[Mr. Reloaded]

That's why I thought it was interesting you and Pot were town

 

[Michelle]

I was rolecrushed.

@Flower this is the claim consequence
Do you like it?

 

[Ratchet]

You're just omgusing me.
That's your problem.

This isn't accurate, his suspicion on you preceded your suspicion on him.

 

[Luka]

-Open Claiming - This game will feature restrictions on neither role claiming nor character claiming

I don't believe I experienced any restriction on claiming my role. A scum role just decided to target me with a rolecrush. Notably it only lasts for this phase.

 

[Flower]

@Flower this is the claim consequence
Do you like it?

It's normal for scum abilities to be flying around kek. So what? Should we just never claim, then, to narrow down the scum pool when we could confirm ourselves instead and just lynch the scum?

 

[Michelle]

This isn't accurate, his suspicion on you preceded your suspicion on him.

He said my slot needs scrutiny if Ekko flips mafia. No read, no vote, no question, no push.
It was me the one pushing him.
Without my push there would not be any discussion.

 

[Grammaton]

i had my vote on pot

i put vote on ekko for his reaction, like all games. does not mean it about you. like jeez

let the man talk

if you saw a player say they think another player is scum, but then voted the same person as the person they just accused, what would be your reaction?

 

[Luka]

Yeah, this is Town kek.

Can you look into Gram vs Mich pls.

I believe that both of them are semi-easy reads. I'll get on it tonight.

 

[Ratchet]

Well the exasperation off that Michelle post makes me think town but I've read all of 3 posts of his.

And I have no read on Michelle outside of she doesn't want to claim which is par the course for wg.

Eh, don't love this. I feel like you're fence sitting on this interaction - I would imagine at the very least you'd want to check over what Gram is pushing Michelle for to see if the exasperation is earned first, no? Instead you just pass it off in a way that would serve to avoid conflict with Gram.

Probably not aligned with Gram I think, on this basis

 

[Flower]

I believe that both of them are semi-easy reads. I'll get on it tonight.

Do it pls .

 

[Random Asshole]

I don't believe I experienced any restriction on claiming my role. A scum role just decided to target me with a rolecrush. Notably it only lasts for this phase.

I mean Ive more or less hard claimed as well, but nothing has happened to me from the Mods, so yeah you got targeted

 

[Michelle]

It's normal for scum abilities to be flying around kek. So what? Should we just never claim, then, to narrow down the scum pool when we could confirm ourselves instead and just lynch the scum?

I didn't notice the mass claim as a game winner element by default. In fact, is the opposite.
We lost a double vote on a wagon today from a player who is a 95% town read of mine.
Not good imo

 

[Naomi]

if you saw a player say they think another player is scum, but then voted the same person as the person they just accused, what would be your reaction?

i already stated earlier i town read ekko, i even tagged him for reaction, i voted for reaction and still kekko ignores me atm.

i have a meme vote on ekko, i am going back to pot later.

if michelle think ekko is scum that her opinion not mine.

i already see other people form on ekko beside me.

 

[Flower]

I didn't notice the mass claim as a game winner element by default. In fact, is the opposite.
We lost a double vote on a wagon today from a player who is a 95% town read of mine.
Not good imo

Who is that 95% Town read?

 

[Michelle]

Who is that 95% Town read?

I think I have lately a better read on him.
For me, a solid town read is 99% and a pretty good one is at 95%

 

[Ratchet]

not great tbh, I’m not really interested in any of the stuff you’ve chosen to focus on here. You’ve said you think she has no strong scum read on Ekko (Of course she doesn’t, he hasn’t played), she’s already decided im scum bussing him, but you appear to be fine with her voting for him over me - could you explain this rather large gap in your logic (you can say she’s illogical if you want, although I’ve played with her before and she usually makes sense)

in fact, I think you’re really wide of the mark here and I suspect you haven’t really read what’s going on. Do you want to try again?

I haven't seen where her vote is, but my strong read was directed to her initial position around Ekko - you said it was a defence, when, while it can be so, it's just as plausible that it's there to provide some nuance to what the actual argument against Ekko is.

I don't hate her vote off of her stated reasoning - she concedes that Ekko can be scum, then saw you tie her to him, in a way that she says makes her think you might know what Ekko would flip. It's not unreasonable then for her to see that, and suspect that you and Ekko are scum together. Further, Ekko has a wagon on him, so supporting that wagon isn't outrageous either, especially if Ekko is town, her basis for suspecting you falls apart too. It's not a bad line of logic, it's not that I necessarily subscribe to it all, but I can see and understand the thought process.

 

[Flower]

I think I have lately a better read on him.
For me, a solid town read is 99% and a pretty good one is at 95%

Yeah, but who are you talking about here?

 

[Michelle]

Yeah, but who are you talking about here?

Luka

 

[Ratchet]

Not satisfied with Ratchet‘s response. Feels like he should be scum reading Gram if that was a real take.

Well I explained why I wasn't scum reading him in that post. What contention do you have with that?

 

[Ratchet]

that's like my entire thing



fine, guess i will randomly assign alignments to people based on almost nothing, maybe get a few right and then at the end of the game act like i'm some kind of mastermind that got those people when right, when in fact it was just pure luck

Probably town