Controversial General Political Discussion

R

Roo

‎
#31,161
#31,161
Logiko said:
"Critical race theories" are not a consensus, its a branch of study, it englobs a lot of type of researches. Saying "critical race theory is not a consensus" is like saying "Cosmology" is not a consensus, its a nonsense.
Click to expand...
oh? so show me one critical race theory that has scientific consensus, i'll wait

In the meanwhile I'll show what happens to professors who pushback against the dogma.

https://compactmag.com/article/a-black-professor-trapped-in-anti-racist-hell



Logiko said:
And there is no such things as "gender theories". THe term "gender theories" is a label invented by the far right to critic the gender studies (which is, again, a branch research of sociology)
Click to expand...
Gender theory is gender studies, the term are interchangeable and alot of it isn't scientific consensus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies

Stop trying to weasel out of it.
Logiko said:
There is no "banning of opposing ideas" unless you are talking about unscientific theories. What you are talking about is the same process that ban the studies of platist theories.

And you not implying that platist theories should be AS studied AS scientific datas of earth, are you ?
Click to expand...
wtf is a platist?

When was the last time you stepped foot in a college? Academia doesn't only deal in scientific consensus. That literally defeats the purpose of thesis and dissertations
 
Zenos7

Zenos7

‎
#31,162
#31,162
Uncle Van said:
People here don't even know political terms by definition even when there's a quick Google search💀 You expect some to read books?
Click to expand...
Forget political terms, i had to pull a definition for a basic term like "building" before.
Post automatically merged:

Roo said:
That literally defeats the purpose of thesis and dissertations
Click to expand...
Ye obviously you also learn how to conduct research in academia
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#31,163
#31,163
Roo said:
oh? so show me one critical race theory that has scientific consensus, i'll wait
Click to expand...
Well, I'm not aware of all the researchs on the subject but a little bit of googling can easily show for example that researchers agrees to say that white supremacism or "racial power" maintain itself alive over time because of the laws put in place. - source wiki

I'm sure you can find a lot of other consensus if you search a little, I'm not an expert on the subject.


Roo said:
In the meanwhile I'll show what happens to professors who pushback against the dogma.

https://compactmag.com/article/a-black-professor-trapped-in-anti-racist-hell
Click to expand...
I didn't read your article, just vaguely and rapidly glanced over it. I saw that the idea that black people should have safe spaces and the fact to trust back women were considered Dogma and I decided not to read further. This vision is traditionnalist and conservatist, I wouldn't listen it as a legitimate criticism of more progressive educations.


Roo said:
Gender theory is gender studies
Click to expand...
No. One is a conservative label created to criticize a field of study, the other is the academic and scientific name of the field


Roo said:
alot of it isn't scientific consensus
Click to expand...
Again, its a field of study, not a consensus. Its like saying that cosmology is a consensus, its an ignorant nonsense.


Roo said:
Stop trying to weasel out of it.
Click to expand...
Read about what you are talking.


Roo said:
wtf is a platist?
Click to expand...
Oh, sorry. I forgot to translate the word.

The word is flat earther.


Roo said:
When was the last time you stepped foot in a college? Academia doesn't only deal in scientific consensus.
Click to expand...
Indeed. But the educations that are criticized by conservative and the far right are not the discipline that don't share a consensus

What conservative, you and the far right are criticizing are the study of sociology. A discipline of science that tends to deliver consensus.
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#31,171
#31,171
Yoho said:
What's that?
Click to expand...
Liberals are people who who think that progress can only come through "liberal" value. Those value have in common the notions of liberty and individualism.

But be careful not to confuse a liberal with someone that is promoting more socialist values like current leftist in USA or in Europe.

Basically liberalism is the ideology in power in the west. Some people are more leaning left toward social progress and others are leaning more right.
 
Yoho

Yoho

✌𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓢𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓽𝔂 𝓸𝓯 𝓛𝓲𝓯𝓮✌
‎
#31,172
#31,172
Logiko said:
Liberals are people who who think that progress can only come through "liberal" value. Those value have in common the notions of liberty and individualism.

But be careful not to confuse a liberal with someone that is promoting more socialist values like current leftist in USA or in Europe.

Basically liberalism is the ideology in power in the west. Some people are more leaning left toward social progress and others are leaning more right.
Click to expand...
Ahhh which way do you lean
 
Bisoromi Bear

Bisoromi Bear

‎
#31,174
#31,174
Logiko said:
Liberals are people who who think that progress can only come through "liberal" value. Those value have in common the notions of liberty and individualism.

But be careful not to confuse a liberal with someone that is promoting more socialist values like current leftist in USA or in Europe.

Basically liberalism is the ideology in power in the west. Some people are more leaning left toward social progress and others are leaning more right.
Click to expand...
Better liberalism than authoritarian dictatorships
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top