Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
You are seriously saying here that Amnesty International is not basing their reasonning on factual data research and reports ? xD
Its always funny with this thread.. when you bring factual data and report, you are either ignored of laughed at and when you give actual vulgarization, suddenly people care about facts and data...
Let's be honest, you wouldn't change your mind if I gave you researched papers or data reports demonstrating the inefficiency of the death penalty, right ?
Its always funny with this thread.. when you bring factual data and report, you are either ignored of laughed at and when you give actual vulgarization, suddenly people care about facts and data...
Let's be honest, you wouldn't change your mind if I gave you researched papers or data reports demonstrating the inefficiency of the death penalty, right ?
Those are facts based on data report and researches. Answer my question please:
You wouldn't change your mind if I gave you researched papers or data reports demonstrating the inefficiency of the death penalty, right ?
So why should I bother searching for the research papers and the data reports ?
Don't act like you suddenly care about datas and researches. When I gave you plenty a few weeks ago, you guys ignored them.
You wouldn't change your mind if I gave you researched papers or data reports demonstrating the inefficiency of the death penalty, right ?
So why should I bother searching for the research papers and the data reports ?
Don't act like you suddenly care about datas and researches. When I gave you plenty a few weeks ago, you guys ignored them.
Do you say "go look up Einstein's theory of relativity" when you say that E=mc² ? No, its just known stuff. At least when you are a researcher.
This is not an encyclopedia, its a vulgarization sum up of the known fact about this subject. If you want to further your understanding of those fact, you can go search for researches on the subject.
Where do you see that ?
I gave 15+ researches paper on the condition of women under patriarchy. And just like now, you ignored them, simply because those papers challenged your understanding of reality
So you prefer this one maybe ?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Or you will ignore it and laugh at science once again ?
This is not an encyclopedia, its a vulgarization sum up of the known fact about this subject. If you want to further your understanding of those fact, you can go search for researches on the subject.
Where do you see that ?
I gave 15+ researches paper on the condition of women under patriarchy. And just like now, you ignored them, simply because those papers challenged your understanding of reality
So you prefer this one maybe ?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Or you will ignore it and laugh at science once again ?
Do you say "go look up Einstein's theory of relativity" when you say that E=mc² ? No, its just known stuff. At least when you are a researcher.
This is not an encyclopedia, its a vulgarization sum up of the known fact about this subject. If you want to further your understanding of those fact, you can go search for researches on the subject.
Where do you see that ?
I gave 15+ researches paper on the condition of women under patriarchy. And just like now, you ignored them, simply because those papers challenged your understanding of reality
So you prefer this one maybe ?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Or you will ignore it and laugh at science once again ?
This is not an encyclopedia, its a vulgarization sum up of the known fact about this subject. If you want to further your understanding of those fact, you can go search for researches on the subject.
Where do you see that ?
I gave 15+ researches paper on the condition of women under patriarchy. And just like now, you ignored them, simply because those papers challenged your understanding of reality
So you prefer this one maybe ?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Or you will ignore it and laugh at science once again ?
Bruh wtf are you on about. Im not talking about myself. Im not in favor of ignoring climate change. But shit like that still fucks up enough people that i think activists need better strategies. Making people go from being ambivalent to actively be against it because you fuck them up isnt helping.
Feel free to disagree
Uhm why not both?!!?!
Doesnt have to be one or the other dude. . .
Feel free to disagree
Post automatically merged:
Uhm why not both?!!?!
Doesnt have to be one or the other dude. . .
Oh sorry, my bad. You are just for the critic of people who take actions.
There is not "one" strategy, there are a lot. Blocking roads is just one annoying way to make the fight be heard in some way. But beside that there is a great range of tools and actions. Environmental lobbying like what Greta T. is doing, Scientific lobbying like the GIEC, Action of sudden awareness like putting paint on art, action of sabotage etc.. there are no bad actions.
No mate. There is no such thing as "ambivalent" people. If you understand the urgency of fighting against climate change then you understand the importance of those action, even when they are annoying. Those who start saying "f*ck em" are those who were already disagreeing or not understanding the urgency of the situation.
Again, there is no more time left, we must do EVERYTHING possible to make people wake up and look at the problem. And if it means annoying them a little for them to remember that resistance still exist, then so be it.
Because one is responsible, the other is fighting that.
You do not blame women who fight ferociously patriarchy and manifest, do ya ?
Maybe you should stop fighting against those who are dominated and more against those who are dominating... no ?
Unless you want me to call you a complicit of inaction of course..
1. Mate.. dear mate..
I proved you two weeks ago with two clear researchs that science could get biased results because of biases in research methodology.
2. What I gave you here:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Is a scientific research paper.
Respect yourself, and stop talking now.
"Let's not do anything about it" 
There is not "one" strategy, there are a lot. Blocking roads is just one annoying way to make the fight be heard in some way. But beside that there is a great range of tools and actions. Environmental lobbying like what Greta T. is doing, Scientific lobbying like the GIEC, Action of sudden awareness like putting paint on art, action of sabotage etc.. there are no bad actions.
No mate. There is no such thing as "ambivalent" people. If you understand the urgency of fighting against climate change then you understand the importance of those action, even when they are annoying. Those who start saying "f*ck em" are those who were already disagreeing or not understanding the urgency of the situation.
Again, there is no more time left, we must do EVERYTHING possible to make people wake up and look at the problem. And if it means annoying them a little for them to remember that resistance still exist, then so be it.
Because one is responsible, the other is fighting that.
You do not blame women who fight ferociously patriarchy and manifest, do ya ?
Maybe you should stop fighting against those who are dominated and more against those who are dominating... no ?
Unless you want me to call you a complicit of inaction of course..
1. Mate.. dear mate..
I proved you two weeks ago with two clear researchs that science could get biased results because of biases in research methodology.
2. What I gave you here:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Is a scientific research paper.
Respect yourself, and stop talking now.
German far right party (afd) thinking about banning non native Germans 
Who would have thought that they are nazis
Who would have thought that they are nazis
Everyone can 
But seriously I never heard this news, seems too extreme , I would ensure illegal immigrants that dont work and add nothing to society leave, and for all other to be checked backround. they arent into position where they can just evict everyone who isnt german. not since they become colony of america who blew up all cheap energy they got