Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Oh sorry, my bad. You are just for the critic of people who take actions.
There is not "one" strategy, there are a lot. Blocking roads is just one annoying way to make the fight be heard in some way. But beside that there is a great range of tools and actions. Environmental lobbying like what Greta T. is doing, Scientific lobbying like the GIEC, Action of sudden awareness like putting paint on art, action of sabotage etc.. there are no bad actions.
No mate. There is no such thing as "ambivalent" people. If you understand the urgency of fighting against climate change then you understand the importance of those action, even when they are annoying. Those who start saying "f*ck em" are those who were already disagreeing or not understanding the urgency of the situation.
Again, there is no more time left, we must do EVERYTHING possible to make people wake up and look at the problem. And if it means annoying them a little for them to remember that resistance still exist, then so be it.
Because one is responsible, the other is fighting that.
You do not blame women who fight ferociously patriarchy and manifest, do ya ?
Maybe you should stop fighting against those who are dominated and more against those who are dominating... no ?
Unless you want me to call you a complicit of inaction of course..
1. Mate.. dear mate..
I proved you two weeks ago with two clear researchs that science could get biased results because of biases in research methodology.
2. What I gave you here:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Is a scientific research paper.
Respect yourself, and stop talking now.
"Let's not do anything about it" 
There is not "one" strategy, there are a lot. Blocking roads is just one annoying way to make the fight be heard in some way. But beside that there is a great range of tools and actions. Environmental lobbying like what Greta T. is doing, Scientific lobbying like the GIEC, Action of sudden awareness like putting paint on art, action of sabotage etc.. there are no bad actions.
No mate. There is no such thing as "ambivalent" people. If you understand the urgency of fighting against climate change then you understand the importance of those action, even when they are annoying. Those who start saying "f*ck em" are those who were already disagreeing or not understanding the urgency of the situation.
Again, there is no more time left, we must do EVERYTHING possible to make people wake up and look at the problem. And if it means annoying them a little for them to remember that resistance still exist, then so be it.
Because one is responsible, the other is fighting that.
You do not blame women who fight ferociously patriarchy and manifest, do ya ?
Maybe you should stop fighting against those who are dominated and more against those who are dominating... no ?
Unless you want me to call you a complicit of inaction of course..
1. Mate.. dear mate..
I proved you two weeks ago with two clear researchs that science could get biased results because of biases in research methodology.
2. What I gave you here:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Is a scientific research paper.
Respect yourself, and stop talking now.
German far right party (afd) thinking about banning non native Germans 
Who would have thought that they are nazis
Who would have thought that they are nazis
Everyone can 
But seriously I never heard this news, seems too extreme , I would ensure illegal immigrants that dont work and add nothing to society leave, and for all other to be checked backround. they arent into position where they can just evict everyone who isnt german. not since they become colony of america who blew up all cheap energy they got
In French here. German source is « correctiv »
https://www.lemonde.fr/internationa...par-appli&lmd_creation=ios&lmd_source=default
https://www.lemonde.fr/internationa...par-appli&lmd_creation=ios&lmd_source=default
Your ideas can only work in theory, but you need actual examples to make it practical.
I’m all about paying taxes for the healthcare of others for instance. Wether they are natives or not. Letting people die in the streets and expelling them from hospitals due to lack of money is only done in Amerikkka
As in, « the opinions of the AfD suck ass » ??
I’m all about paying taxes for the healthcare of others for instance. Wether they are natives or not. Letting people die in the streets and expelling them from hospitals due to lack of money is only done in Amerikkka
As in, « the opinions of the AfD suck ass » ??
German far right party (afd) thinking about banning non native Germans Who would have thought that they are nazis 
Who would have thought that they are nazis
[automerge]1704912675[/automerge]
Not understanding the issue is kinda what i was trying to get at. So yeah i still think its more damaging than helping
[automerge]1704912720[/automerge]
But in a way that i think is fair to scrutinize. So still both
[automerge]1704913706[/automerge]
Not fighting, just criticizing?!
Last edited: